2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2018.2874312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Local-Global Multi-Graph Descriptors for RGB-T Object Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cvejic et al [14] investigates the effect of pixel-level fusion of visible and infrared videos on object tracking performance. After that, the representative works are based on sparse representation [15], [1], [16], [17], manifold ranking [18], [19] and dynamic graph [20], [21]. Early works focus on the sparse representation due to their robustness to noise and outliers.…”
Section: A Traditional Methods For Rgbt Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cvejic et al [14] investigates the effect of pixel-level fusion of visible and infrared videos on object tracking performance. After that, the representative works are based on sparse representation [15], [1], [16], [17], manifold ranking [18], [19] and dynamic graph [20], [21]. Early works focus on the sparse representation due to their robustness to noise and outliers.…”
Section: A Traditional Methods For Rgbt Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works, however, rely on the structure-fixed graphs, and the relations among patches are not well explored. To handle this problem, Li et al [20] propose a spatially regularized graph learning to automatically explore the intrinsic relationship of global patches and local patches. Besides, Li et al [21] propose a sparse representation regularized graph learning to explore patch relations in an adaptive manner.…”
Section: A Traditional Methods For Rgbt Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the fusion of RGB and TIR data more easily achieves all-weather object tracking in the open environment, the researches on RGB-T object tracking methods become more and more popular. From the perspective of data fusion, the RGB-T object tracking framework can be roughly divided into traditional methods [ 38 , 39 ], sparse representation (SR)-based [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], graph-based [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], correlation filter-based [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ], and deep learning-based approaches. Earlier studies used manual features to perform the appearance modeling of the target object.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details about the attributes are listed in Table 1. The performance of SiamFT on nineteen sequences are compared with 14 state-of-the-art trackers, including ECO [41], C-COT [42], CN [43], JSR [3], CSK [44], CT [45], L1 [46], MIL [47], RPT [48], STC [49], STRUCK [50], TLD [51], SGT [33], LGMG [36]. In these methods, the JSR, L1, SGT and LGMG methods are designed for RGB-infrared fusion tracking, while the others are originally developed for tracking based on visible images.…”
Section: B Sequences and Compared Trackersmentioning
confidence: 99%