2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning metal artifact reduction in cardiac CT images with moving pacemakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different strategies for deep learning-based metal artefact reduction (MAR) of CT images were explored either in the image or projection domains [18][19][20][21][22]. The evaluation of CT images after MAR demonstrated the superior performance of the deep learning-based MAR in the image domain (DLI-MAR) when additional information (prior knowledge) in the form of CT images corrected by the normalized MAR approach was also fed to the network (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different strategies for deep learning-based metal artefact reduction (MAR) of CT images were explored either in the image or projection domains [18][19][20][21][22]. The evaluation of CT images after MAR demonstrated the superior performance of the deep learning-based MAR in the image domain (DLI-MAR) when additional information (prior knowledge) in the form of CT images corrected by the normalized MAR approach was also fed to the network (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning-based algorithms emerged as promising approaches for solving a variety of image analysis and pattern recognition problems and have been successfully implemented in the context of metal artefact reduction in CT imaging [18][19][20][21][22][23]. Deep learning-based MAR techniques could be categorized as the 4th type of MAR approaches, wherein the correction for metal-induced beam hardening is applied in either the projection [22] or image domain [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VMI at higher keV levels provided significant reduction of artifacts at CIED generator and leads (with exception of VMI for hypodense artifacts at the leads) in the subjective assessment, whereas a significant decrease of artifacts in the objective analysis was only observed for Prior studies have investigated the use of VMI, MAR, and their combination (VMI MAR ) from dual-energy CT for reduction of artifacts arising from high density materials, such as orthopedic hardware [24], dental implants [13], deep brain stimulation leads [25], iodinated contrast agent [26], and coils and clips for intracranial aneurysm treatment [21,27,28]. More recent studies focusing on the reduction of artifacts impairing the assessment of the heart and surrounding structures (e.g., from pacemaker devices or other cardiac hardware) showed promising results for the application of artifact reduction algorithms and reconstruction techniques to improve image quality [12,[14][15][16][17]. For instance, Tatsugami et al demonstrated that artifact reduction algorithms allow for a superior Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the CIED leads, VMI alone (third row) provide only minimal benefit in artifact reduction, whereas performance by VMI MAR (bottom row) is a lot stronger assessment of coronary arteries in patients with CIEDs [12]. Also, the application of a convolutional network has been successfully tested for the reduction of artifacts from pacemaker leads [16]. Van Hedent et al investigated the application of VMI for the reduction of artifacts in chest and abdominal imaging of patients including artifacts from pacemakers [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation