2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58568-6_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Monocular Visual Odometry via Self-Supervised Long-Term Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 and quantitative results are shown in Table IV. As can be seen, the proposed method significantly outperforms all the other learning-based VO methods, which includes a long-term model trained with 97 frames [49] and the algorithms [50] trained online on a test set. Compared with a pure geometry-based algorithm, such as ORB-SLAM [3] or DSO [4], the proposed model also achieves remarkable advantages in sequence 09.…”
Section: Odometry Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 and quantitative results are shown in Table IV. As can be seen, the proposed method significantly outperforms all the other learning-based VO methods, which includes a long-term model trained with 97 frames [49] and the algorithms [50] trained online on a test set. Compared with a pure geometry-based algorithm, such as ORB-SLAM [3] or DSO [4], the proposed model also achieves remarkable advantages in sequence 09.…”
Section: Odometry Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, to avoid the need for annotated data, self-supervised VO has been developed using the SfM pipeline. These methods accept continuous image input and infer VO via a CNN [7], [8] or LSTM [49], [50]. To combine the advantages of geometrybased and deep-learning methods, several works [10], [9] have separately learned the various components (e.g., optical flow, depth, and VO) of the entire system; others [11] have tried to combine them and train them jointly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the scale inconsistency of SSM-VO, Bian et al [1] propose a geometry consistency loss to constrain the learning process, obtaining more accurate and scale-consistent results. Recently, inspired by geometric methods, Zou et al [32] propose a new self-supervised framework with a two-layer ConvLSTM [26], which maintains local and global consistency. Although these methods obtain some positive results, their self-supervised loss function relies on the consistency loss.…”
Section: B Self-supervised Vo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We select MonoDepth2 [8] and SC-Depth [2] as our baseline SSM-VO systems. SC-Depth purportedly outperforms all previous monocular alternatives except the most recent approach [32]. However, [32] is not open-sourced, so we consider SC-Depth as the best open-sourced SSM-VO system.…”
Section: A Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some focused on solving specific issues that often occur in training and at test time, e.g., the scale inconsistency issue [17,36,39] and the mixed information brought in by independent motion or static frames [2,11,20]. Better network architectures have been proposed [12,23,44,50]. Additional training objectives that extend the photometric constraint [42,45] or introduce geometric constraints [2,19,26,41,42] have been found useful.…”
Section: Monocular Depth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%