2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning movement synchronization in multi-component robotic systems

Abstract: Imitation learning of tasks in multi-component robotic systems requires capturing concurrency and synchronization requirements in addition to task structure. Learning time-critical tasks depends furthermore on the ability to model temporal elements in demonstrations. This paper proposes a modeling framework based on Petri nets capable of modeling these aspects in a programming by demonstration context. In the proposed approach, models of tasks are constructed from segmented demonstrations as task Petri nets, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction can be indirect, when the user operates the robot by commanding it, or direct, when the communication between the user and robot is bidirectional and the robot can act on its own (Thrun, 2004). The role of humans in relation to robots can vary: The human can be a supervisor, operator, mechanic, teammate, bystander, mentor, or information consumer (e.g., Alenljung, et al, 2017;Goodrich & Schultz, 2007;Scholtz, 2003) and can directly transfer physical human skills to robots Thabet, Montebelli, & Kyrki, 2016;Tykall, Montebelli, & Kyrki, 2016).…”
Section: 'I' Is For Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction can be indirect, when the user operates the robot by commanding it, or direct, when the communication between the user and robot is bidirectional and the robot can act on its own (Thrun, 2004). The role of humans in relation to robots can vary: The human can be a supervisor, operator, mechanic, teammate, bystander, mentor, or information consumer (e.g., Alenljung, et al, 2017;Goodrich & Schultz, 2007;Scholtz, 2003) and can directly transfer physical human skills to robots Thabet, Montebelli, & Kyrki, 2016;Tykall, Montebelli, & Kyrki, 2016).…”
Section: 'I' Is For Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%