2015
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0839-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning of monocular information facilitates breakthrough to awareness during interocular suppression

Abstract: Continuous flash suppression (CFS) is a potent method of inducing binocular rivalry, wherein a rapid succession of high-contrast images presented to one eye effectively blocks from awareness a low-contrast image presented to the other eye. Here we addressed whether the contents of the suppressed image can break through to awareness with extended CFS exposure. On 2/3 of the trials, we presented a faint bar (the target) to the nondominant eye while a high-contrast flickering Mondrian (the mask) was displayed to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is well in line with other CFS studies highlighting that adaptation, perceptual learning, and stimulus-reward learning are primarily monocular (Seitz et al. , 2009; Stein and Sterzer, 2011; Mastropasqua et al. , 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This observation is well in line with other CFS studies highlighting that adaptation, perceptual learning, and stimulus-reward learning are primarily monocular (Seitz et al. , 2009; Stein and Sterzer, 2011; Mastropasqua et al. , 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A faster perceptual transition from the CFS mask to the moving dots would then resemble a faster switch rate for images engaged in binocular rivalry after repeated exposure. The results also resemble those of Mastropasqua et al (2015), who reported that the chance of detecting a stimulus suppressed by CFS increases after repeated exposure with a single session. In that study, observers were instructed to detect a bar after a 3-s suppression by CFS in repeating blocks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This participant was excluded from the analysis. The decrease of stimuli suppression efficiency for this participant might be the same effect reported by a few previous CFS studies, where participants saw more stimuli as the experiment progressed ( Ludwig et al, 2013 ; Lupyan and Ward, 2013 ; Mastropasqua et al, 2015 ; Stein and Peelen, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%