2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning of writing letter-like sequences in children with physical and multiple disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
6
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that explicit learning may be more effective in learning to write letter-like patterns is in line with studies on handwriting instructions and therapeutic interventions (Berninger et al, 1997;Naka, 1998;Smits-Engelsman et al, 2013;Vinter & Chartrel, 2010), and with previous experimental studies (Jongbloed-Pereboom et al, 2015;Overvelde & Hulstijn, 2011b). Although during training, participants had a higher velocity in the implicit condition and performed similar on accuracy, participants performed better in the test phase after the explicit condition: accuracy and velocity were higher than after the implicit condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding that explicit learning may be more effective in learning to write letter-like patterns is in line with studies on handwriting instructions and therapeutic interventions (Berninger et al, 1997;Naka, 1998;Smits-Engelsman et al, 2013;Vinter & Chartrel, 2010), and with previous experimental studies (Jongbloed-Pereboom et al, 2015;Overvelde & Hulstijn, 2011b). Although during training, participants had a higher velocity in the implicit condition and performed similar on accuracy, participants performed better in the test phase after the explicit condition: accuracy and velocity were higher than after the implicit condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The latter study indeed showed involvement of working memory during written language production (Kellog et al, 2007). Conversely, in our recent study (Jongbloed-Pereboom et al, 2015), using a previous version of the present task, we also failed to find an effect of visual working memory on explicit learning. Two plausible explanations may account for these findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Children with low working memory capacity did not show learning. In contrast, two other recent studies involving children, both typically developing children and children with severe motor difficulties, did not find support for the conjecture that working memory capacity is associated with learning (Brocken, Kal, & van der Kamp, 2016;Jongbloed-Pereboom, Peeters, Overvelde, Nijhuis-van der Sanden, & Steenbergen, 2015). The relationship between working memory capacity and performance during practice (or acquisition performance) was not assessed in these studies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 64%
“…This demonstrated that children with low motor abilities can indeed learn implicitly and do not necessarily need to learn explicitly via the provision of explicit instructions to stimulate the accumulation of declarative knowledge. Effective implicit motor learning has also been reported for children born preterm (Jongbloed-Pereboom et al, 2017), children with unilateral cerebral palsy (van der Kamp, Steenbergen, & Masters, 2017), children with multiple disabilities (Jongbloed-Pereboom et al, 2015), and children with intellectual disabilities (Capio, Poolton, Sit, Eguia, & Masters, 2013). There may be alternative reasons why children did not learn explicitly.…”
Section: The Roles Of Working Memory Capacity and Declarative Knowledmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the curious facts about the previous studies on the development of handwriting is that the tasks performed by participants were often not the actual task of writing meaningful letters, but that of drawing or tracing of nonsense graphic forms such as straight lines and ellipses (Danna, Enderli, Athènes, & Zanone, 2012;Greer & Lockman, 1998), continuous lines of loop patterns (Bosga-Stork, Bosga, & Meulenbroek, 2011), or other abstract letter-like patterns (Duval et al, 2015;Jongbloed-Pereboom, Peeters, Overvelde, Nijhuis-van der Sanden, & Steenbergen, 2015). In these studies, the task of handwriting was viewed as the task of forming and producing a desired spatial trajectory of the tip of a tool held in hand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%