1965
DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1965.10533107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning-Set Formations by Naive Rhesus Monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1965
1965
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trial 2 win-stay responses began at a higher than chance level and by the end of 120 extended problems constituted 80% of such responses. This contrasts markedly with the failure of naive macaques in the McDowell et al (1965) study to show other than chance Trial 2 performance during 1,344 2-trial win-stay problems. One can only speculate why those animals failed to improve, but it is likely that they developed strong position habits.…”
Section: Pretrainingcontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Trial 2 win-stay responses began at a higher than chance level and by the end of 120 extended problems constituted 80% of such responses. This contrasts markedly with the failure of naive macaques in the McDowell et al (1965) study to show other than chance Trial 2 performance during 1,344 2-trial win-stay problems. One can only speculate why those animals failed to improve, but it is likely that they developed strong position habits.…”
Section: Pretrainingcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The most straightforward way to accomplish this would be to train the WS group on a series of 2-trial problems in which the Trial 1 response to either object would be rewarded and Trial 2 reward would be obtained by responding to the same object responded to on Trial 1. However, naive monkeys failed to show any improvement on this task after 1,344 problems (McDowell, Gaylord, & Brown, 1965). The corresponding training for a hypothetical LS group would consist of training on a series of 2-trial problems, in which the Trial 1 response to either object would be nonrewarded and on Trial 2 reward would be obtained by responding to the object not responded to on Trial 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation