2006
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2006.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning shape-classes using a mixture of tree-unions

Abstract: Abstract-This paper poses the problem of tree-clustering as that of fitting a mixture of tree unions to a set of sample trees. The treeunions are structures from which the individual data samples belonging to a cluster can be obtained by edit operations. The distribution of observed tree nodes in each cluster sample is assumed to be governed by a Bernoulli distribution. The clustering method is designed to operate when the correspondences between nodes are unknown and must be inferred as part of the learning p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These correspondences must be estimated by graph matching. The most related to ours is recent work on 2D shape recognition based on learning structural archetypes of graphs -such as, e.g., super-graph [4], mixture of trees [23], and generative Delaunay graph [22]. These approaches typically make restrictive assumptions (e.g., model edges are independent and have Bernoulli distribution [22]), and cannot handle weights associated with both nodes and edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These correspondences must be estimated by graph matching. The most related to ours is recent work on 2D shape recognition based on learning structural archetypes of graphs -such as, e.g., super-graph [4], mixture of trees [23], and generative Delaunay graph [22]. These approaches typically make restrictive assumptions (e.g., model edges are independent and have Bernoulli distribution [22]), and cannot handle weights associated with both nodes and edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most related to ours is recent work on 2D shape recognition based on learning structural archetypes of graphs -such as, e.g., super-graph [4], mixture of trees [23], and generative Delaunay graph [22]. These approaches typically make restrictive assumptions (e.g., model edges are independent and have Bernoulli distribution [22]), and cannot handle weights associated with both nodes and edges. We also extend the tree-union models for object recognition and texture analysis, presented in [21,2], by accommodating arbitrary permutations of nodes in our spatiotemporal graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning of explicit cluster prototypes is a difficult task. For instance, in related work we have developed a greedy algorithm that minimizes a description length criterion (Torsello and Hancock, 2006). Lozano and Escolano (2003) use the EM algorithm to learn the prototype.…”
Section: Graph Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques provide a structural model of the samples -however, the way in which the supergraph is learned or estimated is largely heuristic in nature and is not rooted in a statistical learning framework. Torsello and Hancock [16] proposed an approach to learn trees by defining a superstructure called tree-union that captures the relations and observation probabilities of all nodes of all the trees in the training set. The structure is obtained by merging the corresponding nodes of the structures and is critically dependent on both the extracted correspondence and the order in which trees are merged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%