1993
DOI: 10.1177/026142949300900109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Style Preferences of Gifted Minority Students

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare the learning style preferences among gifted African-American, MexicanAmerican, and American-born Chinese middle grade students, considering gender and grade levels. The subjects were randomly selected from seven Chicago public schools, and group-administered the Learning Style Inventory. A three-way analysis of variance revealed significant ethnic, gender and grade differences among gifted AfricanAmerican, Mexican-American and American-born Chinese students on several l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other learner characteristics that have also been associated with gifted students’ instructional preferences. These include age (Chan, 2001; Hlawaty, 2009; Honigsfeld, 2001), gender (Hlawaty, 2009; Honigsfeld, 2001; Li & Adamson, 1992; Li & Bourque, 1987; Ristow et al, 1985), and culture (Ewing & Yong, 1992, 1993; Honigsfeld, 2001; Lee & Siegle, 2008-2009; Yong & McIntyre, 1992). Variations in methods and analyses preclude efforts to derive crisp, comprehensive summary statements across these studies, leaving subsequent research to explain inconsistent findings in future studies.…”
Section: Learning Preferences and Styles Of Students Identified As Gimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other learner characteristics that have also been associated with gifted students’ instructional preferences. These include age (Chan, 2001; Hlawaty, 2009; Honigsfeld, 2001), gender (Hlawaty, 2009; Honigsfeld, 2001; Li & Adamson, 1992; Li & Bourque, 1987; Ristow et al, 1985), and culture (Ewing & Yong, 1992, 1993; Honigsfeld, 2001; Lee & Siegle, 2008-2009; Yong & McIntyre, 1992). Variations in methods and analyses preclude efforts to derive crisp, comprehensive summary statements across these studies, leaving subsequent research to explain inconsistent findings in future studies.…”
Section: Learning Preferences and Styles Of Students Identified As Gimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curriculum/instructional strategies used in the 25 programs studied can be categorized into four areas: early intervention, best practices in gifted education, enrichment/challenge opportunities, and mentorships (Banks & McGee-Banks, 2001;Ewing & Yong, 1993;Kaplan, 1999;Maker & Schiever, 1989;Renzulli, 1994;Sleeter, 1990;Slocumb & Payne, 2000). Early intervention opportunities addressed discrepancies in students' early learning experiences and the knowledge necessary for subsequent placement in gifted programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study did not include a comparison group composed of males or non-African American participants; therefore, it is possible that anxiety levels would vary by gender and ethnicity. Also, differences in learning styles have been reported in some studies (Ewing & Young, 1992, 1993Hilliard, 1992;Matthews & Hamby, 1995;Melear & Richardson, 1994;Nuby & Oxford, 1996;White, 1992;Wilson, 1996).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%