2006
DOI: 10.1109/te.2006.882366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Styles of Computer Programming Students: A Middle Eastern and American Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
3
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
36
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of Chisquare test showed significant difference in the learning style along four dimensions between males and females. Our results however, were in contrast with Zulkernan et al [52] who showed no differences in learning style based on gender. The results however, supported W-Fat [39] and Wang and Chen [41] who found that participants" learning style and gender consciousness significantly affected the students" project performance.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The result of Chisquare test showed significant difference in the learning style along four dimensions between males and females. Our results however, were in contrast with Zulkernan et al [52] who showed no differences in learning style based on gender. The results however, supported W-Fat [39] and Wang and Chen [41] who found that participants" learning style and gender consciousness significantly affected the students" project performance.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This finding was similar to their preferences for these dimensions according to their field of study and gender. These findings were both a contrast and similarity to Zualkernan et al's cross-cultural comparison of students' learning styles preferences which revealed engineering students as having preferences for the active, sensing, visual and sequential learning styles [37].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The majority of reviewed studies have developed their own systems to provide adaptivity such as MAS-PLANG [68], AES-CS [77], INSPIRE [13], POLCA [51][102], ADOPTA [46], iWeaver [103][31], WELSA [4], ALS-LSCS [104], SAVER [12], LS-AEHS [73] and Oscar [105] due to the ease of building a system which consider such traits from scratch than incorporating them in a system which has been built for offering a classic e-learning. However, the most popular open source Learning Management System (LMS) Moodle has been also extended in some studies in order to generalise the benefits of LS-BAEHSs [57] [110], whereas, the rest have investigated the impacts of LS on other systems' aspects which relate to adaptation process such as assessing the synergy between LS and students' achievement or exploring the relationship between students' behaviour and LS in webbased learning systems. These studies have adopted different LS models and confirmed that there is a statistical significance of delivering learning materials which match students' LS on their achievement [111] [115] have to be interpreted with caution if they are compared with the opposite results of a host of studies that used similar evaluation approaches and sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%