2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-013-0330-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning subtraction and addition through digital boards: a Down syndrome case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e benefits of mobile technology can be found anywhere: communication, education, scientific research, healthcare, and entertainment, to name a few, but despite its multidisciplinary application, mobile technology and all its advantages are far away from being accessible to people with disabilities [1], people with Down syndrome among them [2]. Researchers in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) have recognized and analyzed several barriers that people with Down syndrome face when interacting with mobile technology [3][4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e benefits of mobile technology can be found anywhere: communication, education, scientific research, healthcare, and entertainment, to name a few, but despite its multidisciplinary application, mobile technology and all its advantages are far away from being accessible to people with disabilities [1], people with Down syndrome among them [2]. Researchers in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) have recognized and analyzed several barriers that people with Down syndrome face when interacting with mobile technology [3][4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research by the authors of this paper on students with DS analysed difficulties and mistakes involving addition, subtraction and problem solving (Noda et al, 2011;González et al, 2015). In that research we found that the mistakes made by students with DS when adding and subtracting stemmed from a lack of conceptual understanding.…”
Section: Objectives and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In some works, these approaches were specific to a particular type of DLO, emphasizing the characteristics that the DLO must have [28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. While these works considered formal guidelines of instructional design of DLOs and pedagogical theory, the development process was presented in a general form.…”
Section: Development Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the model was presented in a general form, and no information about the type of tools to be used at each point of the methodology was presented (i.e., how to identify the appropriate competencies and requisites, evaluation methods, usability metrics). The emotional factor that is important for the integration of new with existing knowledge within the learning process [22] was not considered within the conception of FLOM nor the development approaches presented in [28][29][30][31][32][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Development Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation