2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Be Sustainable in ICT for Development: A Citizen Engagement Initiative in South Africa

Abstract: The uncertainty and complexity of ICT4D projects call into question the suitability of conventional approaches to project management that are imposed exogenously, particularly in relation to the challenge of supporting sustainability and resilience. Attempts to transfer knowledge or ownership to local stakeholders or other responsible bodies fail, and consequently many worthwhile initiatives become unsustainable. The problem is particularly acute in the case of citizen engagement projects, where diverse stakeh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group member relations and conflict also occur among members of the implementation team of an e-governance project. This is typical, as such a project is transdisciplinary in nature, bringing together worldviews, cultures and multiple disciplines required to implement such a complex initiative (Pade-Khene and Lannon, 2017). The Co-Directors of the project provide such an example.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Group member relations and conflict also occur among members of the implementation team of an e-governance project. This is typical, as such a project is transdisciplinary in nature, bringing together worldviews, cultures and multiple disciplines required to implement such a complex initiative (Pade-Khene and Lannon, 2017). The Co-Directors of the project provide such an example.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these stakeholders interact in a web of complexity and uncertainty in an environment that is politically influenced, as well as marginalised. Conflicting perspectives exist between stakeholders, as well as within stakeholder groups – in this case, each group has a specific objective that they expect to achieve with the e-Government initiative (Pade-Khene and Lannon, 2017; Clifford-Holmes, 2014). A strategist needs to manoeuvre around these constraints, and devise strategies to engage all key stakeholders (either separately, or together), in an effort to learn whether or not an e-Government initiative can function within its context.…”
Section: Stakeholders At the Local Municipal Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such initiatives are often based on community projects that are sponsored by the government or non-governmental organizations or the private sector. However, there are concerns over such projects as their implementation and sustainability remains scarce [1,4,5]. Thus, cases have been reported of ICT projects implementations that have failed to make a meaningful contribution to marginal areas [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, cases have been reported of ICT projects implementations that have failed to make a meaningful contribution to marginal areas [3]. Community ICT projects are complex and their success often depends on various environmental and contextual factors [5] something that makes lessons learned from one case not easily transferable to the next [6]. It is against this background that this study presents a reflection of an ICT for Development (ICT4D) project that was implemented in Namibia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this does not imply that such projects do not have successful outcomes -these outcomes can only be fully realised when an effort is made to apply endogenous practices to understand institutional forces that support or hinder implementation and sustainability (Mansell 2011). The failures and challenges should be seen by researchers and practitioners as opportunities to learn from them, unlearn wrong practices and apply incremental changes or develop possible mechanisms and theories to address these specific failures (Dodson, Sterling & Bennett 2012;Pade-Khene & Lannon 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%