“…In one study perception of team efficacy decreased after graduation.3 papers [20, 49, 50]; | - Exposure to IP teams
| - Students ask for longitudinal integrated IPE and longitudinal clerkships |
| | - IPE as a training in comparison with lectures resulted in significantly higher mean scores on the subscales ‘quality of care’ and ‘patient-centered care’. |
7 papers [33, 35, 39–41, 57, 71] | - Stimulating teamwork training
| - Training of team communication skills enhances motivation and positive attitudes toward IPC. Students had learned about their performance and lack of professional skills alongside team skills. |
6 papers [17, 18, 25, 42–44] | - Teacher facilitating reflection
| - A teacher helping students think, plan, do and check their work, thus stimulating teamwork rather than teaching knowledge. |
6 papers [23, 24, 46–49, 76] | - Shared learning
| - Value in learning about professional differences and identity. Students saw the benefits of shared learning, medical students saw the advantages only early in their training. |
18 papers [21, 22, 34, 35, 37, 39, 43, 44, 54–59, 68, 74, 75, 77] | - Learning in authentic context
| - Clinical realism, like simulation or interprofessional training unit, offered students an opportunity to identify other professionals’ functions in relation to patient care and to clearly assess and describe patients’ problems and needs. |
1 paper [49] | | - Readiness for IPE and attitude towards health care teams improved after IPE involving teaching through practice and decreased after IPE involving teaching only through lectures. |
2 papers [43, 77] | - Integrating IPE & specific learning goals
| - Combination of professional specific and IPE learning goals was achieved by students in advanced years (8th semester) |
1 paper [59] | - Follow up training
| - A Team communication training was followed by regular IP team meetings. |
Barriers | 8 papers [17, |
…”