2001
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.63.036217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to control a complex multistable system

Abstract: In this paper the control of a periodically kicked mechanical rotor without gravity in the presence of noise is investigated. In recent work it was demonstrated that this system possesses many competing attracting states and thus shows the characteristics of a complex multistable system. We demonstrate that it is possible to stabilize the system at a desired attracting state even in the presence of high noise level. The control method is based on a recently developed algorithm [S. Gadaleta and G. Dangelmayr, C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it was shown recently [Feudel & Grebogi, 1997;Feudel et al, 1998;Kraut et al, 1999;Gadaleta & Dangelmayr, 2001] that the task of controlling complexity in multistable systems goes far beyond the original [Shinbrot et al, 1990] control-of-chaos idea. As well as stabilising the system on one of the attractors, one needs to control switching between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was shown recently [Feudel & Grebogi, 1997;Feudel et al, 1998;Kraut et al, 1999;Gadaleta & Dangelmayr, 2001] that the task of controlling complexity in multistable systems goes far beyond the original [Shinbrot et al, 1990] control-of-chaos idea. As well as stabilising the system on one of the attractors, one needs to control switching between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar situation occurs when multistable systems require stabilization with respect to small perturbations like noise [Feudel & Grebogi, 1997 or when a control strategy is needed to switch from one desired attractor to another. Multistability is a fragile phenomenon: it can be suppressed by weak perturbations [Pisarchik & Corbalán, 1999;Pisarchik & Goswami, 2000;Chizhevsky, 2001], a feature that can be exploited in control techniques [Triandaf & Schwartz, 2000;Gadaleta & Dangelmayr, 2001;Pisarchik, 2001]. Our study is thus relevant in designing control strategies since these typically require knowledge about the basins of attraction: the asymptotic dynamics in the system without control depend crucially both on initial conditions as well as on the extent of the basin of the given attractor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By introducing pseudoperiodic driving [14,15] or harmonic disturbance [16,17], the undesirable attractor types could be eliminated, and then, the system could be controlled in a certain stable state. In order to stabilize the system in a certain desired state, feedback control strategy was usually adopted [18], such as periodic driving [19] and time-delay feedback [13]. Yet these control strategies cannot achieve the multistable control.…”
Section: Multistability Generic Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional control strategies usually adopted nonfeedback control strategy to convert a multistable system to a mono-stable system [13][14][15][16][17] or adopted feedback control strategy to stabilize the system in a certain desired state [13,18,19]. But these control strategies cannot achieve the multistable control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%