Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information &Amp; Knowledge Management 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3340531.3411997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Distract: A Hierarchical Multi-Decoder Network for Automated Generation of Long Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions for Reading Comprehension

Abstract: The task of generating incorrect options for multiple-choice questions is termed as distractor generation problem. The task requires high cognitive skills and is extremely challenging to automate. Existing neural approaches for the task leverage encoder-decoder architecture to generate long distractors. However, in this process two critical points are ignored-firstly, many methods use Jaccard similarity over a pool of candidate distractors to sample the distractors. This often makes the generated distractors t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These algorithms include distractor generation for software engineering courses [9], cloze-style questions [34] and general computer-aided assessments [10]. However, interaction with these algorithms and insight into their results are limited [29]. Therefore, the implementation of question and distractor generation remains low due to barriers experienced by teachers, such as the required shift needed to adopt the tool, or the anxiety regarding using such tool in education [33].…”
Section: Automated Question and Distractor Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms include distractor generation for software engineering courses [9], cloze-style questions [34] and general computer-aided assessments [10]. However, interaction with these algorithms and insight into their results are limited [29]. Therefore, the implementation of question and distractor generation remains low due to barriers experienced by teachers, such as the required shift needed to adopt the tool, or the anxiety regarding using such tool in education [33].…”
Section: Automated Question and Distractor Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reading comprehension, participants may evaluate the generated candidates in comparative or quantitative methods Maurya and Desarkar, 2020). The former typically involve the selection of distractors based on specific objectives such as confusion criteria by showing list of generated candidates with ground truth answer -without telling the answer to participants and let participant select the most suitable option.…”
Section: Human Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creating multiple-choice questions manually is one of the most labor-intensive task for educators (Ch and Saha, 2018), since questions need to include plausible false options, known as distractors, able to confuse the examinee. To generate distractors, various approaches are utilized, including learning-based (Liang et al, 2018) that rank options according to a set of features, advanced deep neural networks (Maurya and Desarkar, 2020), and pretrained large language models (Chiang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%