Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2348283.2348371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to rank social update streams

Abstract: As online social media further integrates deeper into our lives, we spend more time consuming social update streams that come from our online connections. Although social update streams provide a tremendous opportunity for us to access information on-the-fly, we often complain about its relevance. Some of us are flooded with a steady stream of information and simply cannot process it in full. Ranking the incoming content becomes the only solution for the overwhelmed users. For some others, in contrast, the inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many existing works aim to use social connections in order to predict the ratings that each user will give to each item; a commonly used assumption is that each user's rating behavior should be somehow similar to that of their friends. However, in many real applications, explicit numerical ratings might not be available and one must instead try to model some form of implicit feedback, such as the media they consume, the pages they browse, the music they listen to, or whom they befriend [4,21]. This setting is called "one-class" recommendation and a variety of solutions have been proposed to solve it by directly modeling relative preferences, or rankings, of items for personalized recommendation [8,12,18,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many existing works aim to use social connections in order to predict the ratings that each user will give to each item; a commonly used assumption is that each user's rating behavior should be somehow similar to that of their friends. However, in many real applications, explicit numerical ratings might not be available and one must instead try to model some form of implicit feedback, such as the media they consume, the pages they browse, the music they listen to, or whom they befriend [4,21]. This setting is called "one-class" recommendation and a variety of solutions have been proposed to solve it by directly modeling relative preferences, or rankings, of items for personalized recommendation [8,12,18,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To motivate this work, we first conduct a simple analysis of preference data from four sources that we will consider in this paper: Ciao 1 , Delicious 2 , LibraryThing 3 and Epinions 4 . All four sources consist of preference data in addition to explicit social connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 4 and discussions above, we can see that (1) CoFiSet is different from other algorithms, since it is based on a new assumption of pairwise preferences over item-sets, and (2) the most closely related works are BPRMF [17], CCF(SoftMax) [20] and PLMF [5], because they also adopt pairwise preference assumptions, exponential family functions in loss terms, and SGD (stochastic gradient descent) style algorithms.…”
Section: Climfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in real applications, users' explicit ratings are not easily obtained, so they are not sufficient for the purpose of training an adequate prediction model, while users' implicit data like browsing and shopping records can be more easily collected. Some recent works have thus turned to improve the recommendation performance via exploiting users' implicit feedbacks, which include users' logs of clicking social updates [5], watching TV programs [6], assigning tags [14], purchasing products [17], browsing web pages [20], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guy et al [4] propose user modelling techniques to improve a user's information stream. More recently, Hong et al [5] have looked at the Pairwise LTR technique to improve click-through rates on LinkedIn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%