2013
DOI: 10.1002/wics.1275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning under nonstationarity: covariate shift and class‐balance change

Abstract: One of the fundamental assumptions behind many supervised machine-learning algorithms is that training and test data follow the same probability distribution. However, this important assumption is often violated in practice, for example, because of an unavoidable sample selection bias or nonstationarity of the environment. Owing to violation of the assumption, standard machine-learning methods suffer a significant estimation bias. In this article, we consider two scenarios of such distribution change-the covar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mathematical models of EMG are not used in HGR due to the difficulty of parameter estimation in non-stationary processes. However, machine learning (ML) methods are widely used because ML can infer a solution for non-stationary processes [21] using several techniques; for example, covariate shift techniques [21,22], class-balance change [22], and segmentation in short stationary intervals [23]. HGR using ML is just one approach to myoelectric control [24], which uses EMG signals to extract control signals to command external devices [25,26], for example, prostheses [1], drones [8], input devices for a computer [27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical models of EMG are not used in HGR due to the difficulty of parameter estimation in non-stationary processes. However, machine learning (ML) methods are widely used because ML can infer a solution for non-stationary processes [21] using several techniques; for example, covariate shift techniques [21,22], class-balance change [22], and segmentation in short stationary intervals [23]. HGR using ML is just one approach to myoelectric control [24], which uses EMG signals to extract control signals to command external devices [25,26], for example, prostheses [1], drones [8], input devices for a computer [27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, uLSIF-based machine learning algorithms have been successfully used in solving various machine learning tasks [10]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a next step, to differentiate between the classes, assistive BRIs use classifier calibration to weight features according to their relevance. However, learning brain self-regulation may lead to non-stationarity of these classes in the course of the training (Vidaurre et al, 2011a ; Sugiyama et al, 2013 ; Naros and Gharabaghi, 2015 ). Unsupervised adaptation of the feature weights may therefore lead to a switch in the mental strategy (Vidaurre et al, 2011b ; Bryan et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodological Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when a patient alters the mental strategy in the course of the intervention, a classifier trained on the initial strategy can become misaligned. In classical brain-interface approaches, the adaptation of feature weights has been proposed for such cases (Vidaurre et al, 2011b ; Bryan et al, 2013 ; Sugiyama et al, 2013 ). But such data-driven approaches can be problematic for restorative approaches; classifier adaptation might condition the patients to explore alternative, i.e., therapeutically non-desired strategies (Bauer and Gharabaghi, 2015a , b ).…”
Section: Regularized Feature Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%