1989
DOI: 10.1109/34.19039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leave-one-out procedures for nonparametric error estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the autocorrelation test results of residual diagnostics based on the Q-statistic are listed in Table 7, showing that there is no autocorrelation in the residual series of the two models, that is, the estimated results of DOLS and FMOLS are valid, and the parameter estimates are consistent. Meanwhile, the robustness of the panel estimated results to the inclusion or exclusion of particular countries are examined using the leave-one-out (LOO) analysis, which is widely used in the field of machine learning algorithms [54][55][56]. In this paper, the idea of LOO analysis can be as follows: on the basis of the original panel set, remove any one country, and the remaining countries constitute a new panel, then re-estimate the new panel and compare the results with the original panel estimation results, so as to analyze the impact of removing a country.…”
Section: Panel Data Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the autocorrelation test results of residual diagnostics based on the Q-statistic are listed in Table 7, showing that there is no autocorrelation in the residual series of the two models, that is, the estimated results of DOLS and FMOLS are valid, and the parameter estimates are consistent. Meanwhile, the robustness of the panel estimated results to the inclusion or exclusion of particular countries are examined using the leave-one-out (LOO) analysis, which is widely used in the field of machine learning algorithms [54][55][56]. In this paper, the idea of LOO analysis can be as follows: on the basis of the original panel set, remove any one country, and the remaining countries constitute a new panel, then re-estimate the new panel and compare the results with the original panel estimation results, so as to analyze the impact of removing a country.…”
Section: Panel Data Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, LOO evaluates each unknown feature vector, and then produces a basis to evaluate classifier designs for powder classification [7], [28]. Therefore, LOO accuracy is also the percentage of correctly classified data sets.…”
Section: Performance Assessment Of Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-validation methods [26], [27] and leave one out (LOO) [28], [29] estimator within the deconvolved T-ray data set are utilized to provide a nearly unbiased estimate of the prediction error rate. The performance of classifying the RNA samples are evaluated using eightfold cross-validation, while the powdered material classification is validated using LOO.…”
Section: Performance Assessment Of Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the leave-one-out technique [4] (a machine learning evaluation technique) to show the performance of our approach. Leave one out involves hiding one trust edge and then trying to predict it.…”
Section: Planmentioning
confidence: 99%