2016
DOI: 10.1037/a0040227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaving behind our preparadigmatic past: Professional psychology as a unified clinical science.

Abstract: Acknowledgement:The behavioral and neurosciences have made remarkable progress in the past couple decades. Major advances have been made in understanding a wide range of phenomena, from epigenetics and neural plasticity to the nature of cognition, emotion, consciousness, moral reasoning, social behavior, and culture. Indeed, so much has been learned about human psychology recently that current explanations of many psychological mechanisms and processes are markedly different from those considered current just … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Even a rather cursory audit of the available literature yields a very large number of potentially important contender independent variables: coping, beliefs, illness perceptions, somatization, attention, fear, avoidance, hypervigilance, depression, anger, endurance, attachment, childhood experience, goals, pacing, motivation, self, and so on. We have argued elsewhere that such a large number of variables as exist today in psychological studies is unwieldly, not easy for others outside the field to understand, and not easy to use to guide research or treatment designs (15,27,28). Some of the elements in our large variable set are difficult to distinguish from each other and some apparent distinctions are probably unimportant or impractical.…”
Section: An Integrative Philosophy and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even a rather cursory audit of the available literature yields a very large number of potentially important contender independent variables: coping, beliefs, illness perceptions, somatization, attention, fear, avoidance, hypervigilance, depression, anger, endurance, attachment, childhood experience, goals, pacing, motivation, self, and so on. We have argued elsewhere that such a large number of variables as exist today in psychological studies is unwieldly, not easy for others outside the field to understand, and not easy to use to guide research or treatment designs (15,27,28). Some of the elements in our large variable set are difficult to distinguish from each other and some apparent distinctions are probably unimportant or impractical.…”
Section: An Integrative Philosophy and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the clinical expert needs epistemic virtues to understand and sometimes confront the fundamental disciplinary uncertainties in psychotherapy research (e.g., nosology, empirical status, research practices, etc.) (Bohart et al, 1998;Westen et al, 2004;Gupta, 2014;Melchert, 2016;Jackson, 2017) and the entanglement of questions of facts and values in psychotherapy (Woolfolk, 2015;Berg and Slaattelid, 2017). This makes the more holistic concept understanding relevant, as opposed to possessing mere factual knowledge (Woolfolk, 2015).…”
Section: Epistemic Virtuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mais do que isto, as práticas profissionais e de ensino da profissão, apoiadas em "tradições teóricas" em psicologia, deveriam ser substituídas por conhecimentos sobre a psicologia humana que fossem fundamentados cientificamente. A "orientação teórica" não deveria sobrepujar a prática baseada em evidências (Melchert, 2016).…”
Section: O Contexto Do Estágio Realizado Em Neuropsicologia E Psicolounclassified