Leben als Grundthema der Phänomenologie

Figal, Günter

doi:10.5771/9783845277455-51

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Figal ( 2015 , p. 15). Figal uses this claim to introduce how his approach is to be distinguished from Heidegger, futher asking: “Ist Heideggers tautologisches Denken, wie es skizziert und aus seiner Entwicklungsgeschichte erläutert wurde, wirklich eine Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren?…”

unclassified

“…10For Figal, “Raum, so last diese Überlegung sich zusammenfassen, erscheint nicht, sondern ist unscheinbar, so das eine Phänomenologie der Äußerlichkeit, eine realistische Phänomenologie, also eine Phänomenologie der Unscheinbarkeit ist.” Or “Space, to sum it all up, does not appear, but is inconspicuous, thus the phenomenology of externality, which is a realistic phenomenology, is a phenomenology of the inconspicuous.” This book follows Figal’s recent resignation from the role of President at the German Heidegger Society, Figal (2015, p. 4).…”

unclassified

“…11Figal (2015, p. 11). “Dass es Phänomenologie, die von Unscheinbaren her denkt, bisher noch nicht gab, könnte eine voreilige Behauptung sein, denn in jedem Fall gibt es einen auf sie hindeutenden Titel.…”

unclassified

“…56Figal (2015, p. 11): “Wenn die bisher entwickelten Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Erscheinung und Unscheinbarkeit überzeugend sind, wären Phänomene im skizzierten Phänomenologischen Sinne also nur angemessen in ihrer Zusammengehörigkeit mit dem Unscheinbaren zu verstehen.”…”

unclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Making sense of Heidegger’s ‘phenomenology of the inconspicuous’ or inapparent (Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren)

Alvis

2017

Cont Philos Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Heidegger's last seminar, which was in Zähringen in 1973, he introduces what he called a "phenomenology of the inconspicuous" (Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren). Despite scholars' occasional references to this "approach" over the last 40 years, this approach of Heidegger's has gone largely under investigated in secondary literature. This article introduces three different, although not necessarily conflicting ways in which these sparse references to inconspicuousness can be interpreted: (1) The a priori of appearance can never be brought to manifestation, and the unscheinbar (inconspicuous) is interwoven with the scheinbar (appearing) as an active characteristic or form of "hiddenness" (Λήθη), therefore making inconspicuousness inherent within all phenomenology. (2) Or, there is now a particular step or reduction within phenomenology that involves one's being attuned to the various modes of potential hiddenness (Verborgenheit and its cognates), of which "inconspicuousness" is a particular character trait. Or (3) there are particular, unique, and specific phenomena that give themselves "inconspicuously," and there is also thus a corresponding, particular phenomenology in which one must engage in order to gain some kind of access to these specific things' phenomenal strata. This paper introduces Heidegger's "phenomenology of the inconspicuous" most especially in his last seminar in Zähringen in 1973, engages related references to unscheinbar in his 1942/1943 Seminar on Parmenides, and then puts forward an interpretation of what these somewhat ambiguous references could mean when

show abstract

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Making sense of Heidegger’s ‘phenomenology of the inconspicuous’ or inapparent (Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren)

Alvis

2017

Cont Philos Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Leben als Grundthema der Phänomenologie

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Making sense of Heidegger’s ‘phenomenology of the inconspicuous’ or inapparent (Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren)

Making sense of Heidegger’s ‘phenomenology of the inconspicuous’ or inapparent (Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About