2019
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1592110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lecturers’ views of assessment design, marking and feedback in higher education: a case for professionalisation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were from foundational students from Computing and Engineering. The data were collected to evaluate the study [42], answer the second research question, and determine the success of the feedforward techniques implemented, which demonstrate student performance and response following module evaluations and their feedback. The data sets are as follows:…”
Section: Research Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were from foundational students from Computing and Engineering. The data were collected to evaluate the study [42], answer the second research question, and determine the success of the feedforward techniques implemented, which demonstrate student performance and response following module evaluations and their feedback. The data sets are as follows:…”
Section: Research Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discourse of assessment literacy -and respect for its existence -should also be central to those who are responsible for teaching and learning in educational settings beyond school. Assessment literacy is needed urgently in higher education because, as Norton et al (2019) argue, academics receive almost no education on how to set, mark and moderate assessments. I don't mean to suggest that all assessment that happens in universities is faulty and open to dispute but, based on my claim above that education does not stand still, university staff need to be open to reflecting on and improving their work as assessors.…”
Section: Discourses Of Confidence In Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, se han encontrado algunas diferencias en función del grupo al que pertenecen los estudiantes, obteniendo mayor nivel de satisfacción los estudiantes pertenecientes a los grupos A y C, frente a los del grupo B. Esto puede deberse al papel del docente en el proceso de evaluación en función de su experiencia, conocimiento sobre el tema, etc. ya que, de los dos docentes implicados en la experiencia, uno de ellos impartía los grupos A y C y el otro el B. Esto podría indicar que es necesaria una capacitación formal de los docentes para profesionalizarse en evaluación (Norton, Floyd y Norton, 2019) que les permita implementar estrategias participativas en sus asignaturas de una manera competente (Quesada-Serra, Rodríguez-Gómez e Ibarra-Sáiz, 2016), rompiendo con las prácticas predominantes en evaluación a través de innovaciones en los diseños de evaluación (Quesada-Serra, Rodríguez-Gómez e Ibarra-Sáiz, 2017).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified