2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2019.8803154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lednet: A Lightweight Encoder-Decoder Network for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation

Abstract: The extensive computational burden limits the usage of CNNs in mobile devices for dense estimation tasks. In this paper, we present a lightweight network to address this problem, namely LEDNet, which employs an asymmetric encoderdecoder architecture for the task of real-time semantic segmentation. More specifically, the encoder adopts a ResNet as backbone network, where two new operations, channel split and shuffle, are utilized in each residual block to greatly reduce computation cost while maintaining higher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
167
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
167
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not competivie for lower-resolution input images [51]. Lightweight Encoder-Decoder Network (LEDNet) [31] employs an asymmetric encoder-decoder architecture for real-time semantic segmentation. The encoder adopts two new operations (i.e., channel split and shuffle) in each residual block to significantly reduce the computational cost, while the decoder uses an attention pyramid network to further reduce the network complexity.…”
Section: B Real-time Semantic Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is not competivie for lower-resolution input images [51]. Lightweight Encoder-Decoder Network (LEDNet) [31] employs an asymmetric encoder-decoder architecture for real-time semantic segmentation. The encoder adopts two new operations (i.e., channel split and shuffle) in each residual block to significantly reduce the computational cost, while the decoder uses an attention pyramid network to further reduce the network complexity.…”
Section: B Real-time Semantic Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate this dilemma, Fig. 1 gives the accuracy (mIoU) and inference speed (frames per second (fps)) obtained by several state-of-the-art methods, including FCN-8s [9], CRF-RNN [17], DeepLab [10], DeepLabv2 [12], DeepLabv3+ [13], ResNet-38 [18], PSPNet [11], DUC [19], RefineNet [20], LRR [21], DPN [22], FRRN [23], TwoColumn [24], SegNet [25], SQNet [26], ENet [27], arXiv:2003.08736v2 [cs.CV] 3 Apr 2020 ERFNet [28], ICNet [29], SwiftNetRN [30], LEDNet [31], BiSeNet1 [32], BiSeNet2 [32], DFANet [33] and our proposed method, on the Cityscapes test dataset. Clearly, how to achieve a good tradeoff between accuracy and speed is still a challenging problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our method with six state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms, including U-Net [6], Attention-Unet [20], GCN [21], CE-Net [52], HRNet [63], LEDNet [64]. Their original implementations were kept and the same experimental conditions were used.…”
Section: E Comparison With Other Deep Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017) which are standard segmentation networks with increasing complexity and also to the following lighter architectures: LEDNet (Wang et al, 2019a), ERFNet (Romera et al, 2017) and D3Net (Carvalho et al, 2018). Figure 7 shows the results obtained with the different architectures under the same training and evaluating conditions.…”
Section: Influence Of the Network Backbonementioning
confidence: 99%