2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1639-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left ventricular flow propagation velocity measurement: Is it cast in stone?

Abstract: post-infarct patients at positions of: one-half (81 ± 31 vs. 58 ± 25 cm/s), two-thirds (89 ± 32 vs. 45 ± 15 cm/s) and 4 cm (98 ± 23 vs. 47 ± 13 cm/s) distances. The use of AV method and measurement position at one-half distance was found to be the most suitable method for assessing diastolic dysfunction given varying left ventricular sizes and inflow jet directions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method substantially reduced the working time because time-consuming grid generation was necessary for only one reference time step, and it guarantees the maintenance of the connections between all grid points. The evidence for the qualitative clarification of the effects of a few simplified internal structures on the LV blood flow is that the present results for model A without internal structures show qualitative correspondence with other studies (Chan et al, 2017;Imanparast et al, 2016) regarding the occurrence of vortices in the diastolic phase and in the outflow from the aortic valve in the systolic phase (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This method substantially reduced the working time because time-consuming grid generation was necessary for only one reference time step, and it guarantees the maintenance of the connections between all grid points. The evidence for the qualitative clarification of the effects of a few simplified internal structures on the LV blood flow is that the present results for model A without internal structures show qualitative correspondence with other studies (Chan et al, 2017;Imanparast et al, 2016) regarding the occurrence of vortices in the diastolic phase and in the outflow from the aortic valve in the systolic phase (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Chivukula et al indicated that when the inflow cannula was angled closer to alignment with the LV long axis, flow from the mitral valve to the inflow cannula was more direct [ 16 ]. However, this may not be typical for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: the mitral jet is often directed more towards the free wall [ 24 ]. Furthermore, it was speculated that the direct flow between the mitral valve and inflow cannula inlet was favourable, contrary to the recommendations presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%