2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.08.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left ventricular perforation during cardiac catheterization in a case of severe calcific aortic stenosis. Should we cross the valve?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stable guiding rail is missing as the guide wire can only be advanced into the LV in a dead-end fashion and therefore cannot provide a safe and firm support. Further, left ventricular guide wire perforations are repeatedly observed and reported [18]. Overall, the transfemoral approach often represents a trade-off in many respects including the mandatory lower crimping profile with increased shear forces on the device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stable guiding rail is missing as the guide wire can only be advanced into the LV in a dead-end fashion and therefore cannot provide a safe and firm support. Further, left ventricular guide wire perforations are repeatedly observed and reported [18]. Overall, the transfemoral approach often represents a trade-off in many respects including the mandatory lower crimping profile with increased shear forces on the device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adverse risk factors in this study for myocardial perforation with the guidewire appeared to be female sex, age above 70 years, an aortic valve area less than 0.7 cm 2 , and a cardiac index of 2.0 l/min/m 2 or less. Bhatia questioned the indication for crossing heavily stenosized aortic valves invasively, when the hemodynamic data were already known by echocardiography [3]. Friedrich et al discussed the diagnosis and management of significant pericardial effusion or tamponade during cardiac catheterization as a result of accidental perforation of the left ventricle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%