1997
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199705000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leg Morbidity and Function Following Fibular Free Flap Harvest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
80
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in previous reports where the donor-site morbidity was considered low or absent in most patients, the investigators used questionnaires or clinical subjective evaluations 12,[18][19][20][21][22] . Whenever possible, clinical data should be supported by quantitative instrumental evaluations allowing an objective assessment of the cost/ benefit ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in previous reports where the donor-site morbidity was considered low or absent in most patients, the investigators used questionnaires or clinical subjective evaluations 12,[18][19][20][21][22] . Whenever possible, clinical data should be supported by quantitative instrumental evaluations allowing an objective assessment of the cost/ benefit ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, donor-site morbidity was considered low in most of patients. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, the fibula functions as the origin and insertion points of various leg and foot muscles, the detachment and injury to these muscles during various fibula harvest will inevitably affect donor leg function. Patients may not always perceive significant functional losses because of compensatory mechanisms or because they use the donor leg only for activities of low functional demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used particularly to reconstruct massive bone defects (greater than 10 cm) after tumor excision [4,9,11,16]. Donor-site morbidity has been reported as a consequence of VFG harvesting [3,10,25,32,36] but generally is considered acceptable when weighed against the potential benefits [8,36]. However, nontraumatic fractures of the donor-side tibia are still reported although as single sporadic cases [7,18,20,29,40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that several studies qualitatively described evolution of the donor-side leg after VFG [1,3,10,25,32,36], these did not quantitatively describe adaptation of the donor-side tibia. Questionnaire results [1,3,30,36], disability scales [1,10,25], or gait analyses [3,25] have been reported in some studies, and disabilities such as pain, ankle instability, and inability to run have been described [1,3,10,18,25,30,32,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation