2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1971953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal N-Grams? A Simple Approach to Track the ‘Evolution’ of Legal Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An n-gram language model predicts the probability of a given n-gram within any sequence of words in the language. It is widely used in text mining [15,16], including in the legal domain [19]. An n-gram is a contiguous sequence of n items from a given sequence of text.…”
Section: Language Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An n-gram language model predicts the probability of a given n-gram within any sequence of words in the language. It is widely used in text mining [15,16], including in the legal domain [19]. An n-gram is a contiguous sequence of n items from a given sequence of text.…”
Section: Language Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research [12,15,35,43,44] has applied computer-based network analysis of courts' citation patterns. Corpus linguistic methods have also been used to add important detail to the otherwise broad picture of judicial practice that network analysis gives [29]. Within the cross-disciplinary field of Law and Language (legal linguistics) empirical studies of legal texts are widespread, but the corpora traditionally consist of small text collections that are analysed manually: see e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S . C ourt of A ppeals, using the L egal L anguage E xplorer (Katz et al., ). The counts are normalized to account for variation in docket size.…”
Section: Reed V Reed As a Jurisprudential Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Legal Language Explorer ( http://legallanguageexplorer.com/) is an online tool that counts the number of times that a particular word or words appears within the corpus of USSC and U.S. Court of Appeals opinions in a given year, returning a time‐series plot (Katz, Bommarito, Seaman, Candeub, & Agichtein, ). Figure reports the normalized results, which control for the volume of cases on the docket in a given year.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%