2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal ontologies over time: A systematic mapping study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provided information about the project's aims and objectives, and its future goals and directions. The authors have also been participating themselves in the relevant European and nationallyfunded projects, such as H2020 smashHit 14 , FFG CampaNeo 15 , FFG DALICC 16 , and therefore had an insider view on the consent representation and modeling issues, and also found and analysed the information about the related projects on the websites of the funding agencies (European Commission, national funding agencies). Finally, relevant works at standardisation bodies have been overviewed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This provided information about the project's aims and objectives, and its future goals and directions. The authors have also been participating themselves in the relevant European and nationallyfunded projects, such as H2020 smashHit 14 , FFG CampaNeo 15 , FFG DALICC 16 , and therefore had an insider view on the consent representation and modeling issues, and also found and analysed the information about the related projects on the websites of the funding agencies (European Commission, national funding agencies). Finally, relevant works at standardisation bodies have been overviewed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research by Rodrigues et al [16] categorises legal ontologies along dimensions of (i) organisation and structuring of information, (ii) reasoning and problem solving, (iii) semantic indexing and search, (iv) semantic integration and interoperability and (v) understanding of a domain. The research in [16] shows that there are various approaches of legal domain and compliance that are addressed by ontologies and that they also assist in other knowledge and data driven processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can provide crucial, although shallow, semantic information for tasks such as question answering (Abujabal et al, 2018;Blanco-Fernández et al, 2020), topic disambiguation (Fernández, N. et al 2012) or detection (Krasnashchok et al, 2018;Lo et al, 2017, Al-Nabki et al, 2019 and revealment of elements relationships (Sarica et al, 2020;Amal et al, 2019). Furthermore, NER has proved to be effective in broader applications, such as user profiling (Nicoletti et al, 2013) and ontology development on unconventional domains (Oliva et al, 2019;Rodrigues et al, 2019). Anyway, since NER is a classification task, for using the most advanced approach in terms of accuracy (corpus-based NER uses deep neural networks) (Devlin et al, 2018), a training set is needed, i.e.…”
Section: Named Entity Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with efforts towards establishing standards and requirements, the analysis of existing work is also important to identify the potential for reuse and essential drawbacks for adoption. To this end, there have been several critical studies that provide an overview of legal ontologies to date (Leone, Di Caro, & Villata, 2019;Rodrigues, Freitas, Barreiros, Azevedo, & de Almeida Filho, 2019) that present the state of legal ontologies and their usage in the community. At the same time, there are efforts to automate the association of legal requirements with applicable standards -specifically those regarding GDPR and ISO (Bartolini, Giurgiu, Lenzini, & Robaldo, 2017).…”
Section: Emerging Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%