2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24908-2_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LegalRuleML: XML-Based Rules and Norms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frameworks for representing and reasoning with norms have been developed in legal computing (Hoekstra et al 2007;Palmirani et al 2011;Lam, Hashmi, and Scofield 2016), multi-agent systems (Vasconcelos, Kollingbaum, and Norman 2009;, and social robotics (Malle, Scheutz, and Austerweil 2017). Recent work has also explored the problems of norm learning and norm identification, through approaches such as belieftheoretic learning (Sarathy, Scheutz, and Malle 2017), priority weight learning for conflicting norms (Kasenberg and Scheutz 2018a), inference from social sanctions in multiagent systems (Savarimuthu et al 2010;Cranefield et al 2015), and rule induction from iterated design specifications (Corapi et al 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frameworks for representing and reasoning with norms have been developed in legal computing (Hoekstra et al 2007;Palmirani et al 2011;Lam, Hashmi, and Scofield 2016), multi-agent systems (Vasconcelos, Kollingbaum, and Norman 2009;, and social robotics (Malle, Scheutz, and Austerweil 2017). Recent work has also explored the problems of norm learning and norm identification, through approaches such as belieftheoretic learning (Sarathy, Scheutz, and Malle 2017), priority weight learning for conflicting norms (Kasenberg and Scheutz 2018a), inference from social sanctions in multiagent systems (Savarimuthu et al 2010;Cranefield et al 2015), and rule induction from iterated design specifications (Corapi et al 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they could capture legal knowledge and be used to ensure that access to data is lawful. Capturing legal knowledge using business rules is not new; for instance, it is discussed in the work of Gong and Janssen (2014) and Palmirani et al (2011).…”
Section: Business Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define a simple yet expressive rule-based language for representing the legal statements that compose a legal domain and we show how a legal domain regulates the operations on the data. Furthermore, we define guidelines to translate LegalRuleML [1] documents into our rule-based language. The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 an overview of the related work; Section 3 introduces the Legal Domain Model; Section 4 presents the architecture we define for integrating such model into a relational DBMS; Section 5 sketches a translation methodology from standard LegalRuleML to our model; Section 6 outlines possible future work and draws the conclusions.…”
Section: Ideas '13mentioning
confidence: 99%