2018
DOI: 10.14686/buefad.337738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LEGO Robotik Öğretim Uygulamalarının Kabulü Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları

Abstract: In the scope of the study it was aimed to develop the acceptance scale of LEGO robotics instructional practices to determine the prospective teachers' acception of LEGO robotics instructional practices. Scale development study was carried out with the help of 360 prospective teachers having been educated at Bartin University during the 2016-2017 academic semester. Before testing form of the scale was applied to the prospective teachers, they had been introduced on LEGO Mindstorms EV3 set and how to integrate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study utilized the use of Croncbach's coefficients, as used by Bujang et al [128] and other researchers within the field, to get the reliability status of the data. A value of .783 was observed during this study, which was an acceptable value based on several studies [129,130]. The paper tests the hypothesis using linear regression, Hope [131], and Pearson correlation [132].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This study utilized the use of Croncbach's coefficients, as used by Bujang et al [128] and other researchers within the field, to get the reliability status of the data. A value of .783 was observed during this study, which was an acceptable value based on several studies [129,130]. The paper tests the hypothesis using linear regression, Hope [131], and Pearson correlation [132].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The instrument of questionnaire adopted by prior studies and modified to be compatible with this study context. The questionnaire was consist of 19 items, four items for perceived usefulness (PU), four items for perceived ease to used, three items for attitude (AT), four items for intention to use (BI), were adopted from Davis [44], and Çukurbaşı [45]. Two items for subjective Norm (SN), and two items for selfefficacy (SE), were adopted from Yuen [13], Bröhl [28], and Nadlifatin [36].…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%