1996
DOI: 10.1006/expr.1996.0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LeishmaniaandSauroleishmania:The Use of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA for the Identification of Parasites from Vertebrates and Invertebrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The geographical origins of L. major isolates studied for heterogeneity and their generic code are shown in Table 2. Genomic DNA was extracted from promastigote stages according to the procedure described (Motazedian et al. 1996; Ishikawa et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The geographical origins of L. major isolates studied for heterogeneity and their generic code are shown in Table 2. Genomic DNA was extracted from promastigote stages according to the procedure described (Motazedian et al. 1996; Ishikawa et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographical origins of L. major isolates studied for heterogeneity and their generic code are shown in Table 2. Genomic DNA was extracted from promastigote stages according to the procedure described (Motazedian et al 1996;Ishikawa et al 2002) with some modification. Briefly, 2 · 10 8 parasites were harvested, washed with PBS and the pellet was re-suspended in 100 ll lysis buffer containing 50 lg ⁄ ml proteinase K and incubated at 42°C for 2 h. DNA was extracted by phenol ⁄ chloroform ⁄ isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and precipitated by 1 ⁄ 10 of its volume using 3 m NaOAc solution pH 7.0 and 2.5 volumes of ethanol and kept at )20°C for 8 h.…”
Section: Testing Of Isolates For Polymorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 80% of the strains of L. infantum isolated thus far belong to the predominant zymodeme, 42). The alternative methods for species and/or strain discrimination include analysis with monoclonal antibodies (17); molecular karyotyping (7, 18); PCR fingerprinting-random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (1,19,36,51,60); and PCR amplification of distinct nuclear multicopy target sequences or kinetoplast DNA, followed by an analysis of the amplificates by sequencing, fragment length polymorphism analysis, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (6,29,30,32,35,44), and singlestrand conformation polymorphism analysis (10). These methods are all limited in the intrinsic level of polymorphism that they can detect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genomic sites selected for analysis often include variable, but redundant sequences, such as kDNA minicircles (Simpson 1987; Stuart 1983) and the intergenic or intragenic regions of the multi‐copied nuclear genes (Luis et al 1998; Mendoza‐Leon, Havercroft, and Barker 1995; Victoir et al 1998). The sensitivity of these approaches is enhanced by PCR amplification of relevant sequences using specific (de Brujin et al 1993; Rodgers, Popper, and Wirth 1990) or random primers (Motazedian et al 1996; Pogue et al 1995; Tibayrenc et al 1993). Regardless of the methodology used, the differences detected presumably reflect the genetic heterogeneity of these parasites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%