2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2676124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lending on Hold: Regulatory Uncertainty and Bank Lending Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper's findings of a decline in hedging as a result of regulatory uncertainty supports similar conclusions in Gissler et al (2016) and Bordo et al (2016) where they find that regulatory and policy uncertainty in banking led to less lending. This paper's contribution lies in the identification method of the hedging instrument and the hedged asset, which is unique to this literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper's findings of a decline in hedging as a result of regulatory uncertainty supports similar conclusions in Gissler et al (2016) and Bordo et al (2016) where they find that regulatory and policy uncertainty in banking led to less lending. This paper's contribution lies in the identification method of the hedging instrument and the hedged asset, which is unique to this literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is precisely what I find in this paper. A reduction in hedging due to regulatory uncertainty would also be broadly consistent with literature on banking regulation and how uncertainty has negative effects on bank lending (Gissler et al, 2016; Bordo et al, 2016), contributing to growing importance on a banking perspective on effects of economic policy uncertainty (Baker et al, 2016; Bonaime et al, 2016; Brogaard & Detzel, 2015; Giavazzi & McMahon, 2012; Koijen et al, 2016) on the economy.…”
Section: Literature Review and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, one can reasonably expect that an increase in EPU would have a negative impact on the activeness of entrepreneurial activities. This expectation could actually be confirmed by the fact that a higher EPU usually has an adverse influence on the credit supply tightening, thereby entrepreneurial activities (Gissler et al, 2016). Such context, increasing the financial constraints and creating entry barriers for entrepreneurs has been observed in Oman (Magd & McCoy, 2014) and Greece (Markatou, 2015), for instance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Following this line of thought, Alessandri and Panetta (2015) show that an increase in the EPU of Baker et al (2016) predicts a tightening in the credit standards reported in the ECB's bank lending survey. Finally, Gissler et al (2016), Valencia (2016), and Bordo et al (2016) document a negative relationship between uncertainty and bank lending in the US.…”
Section: Robustness Tests With Volatility and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 95%