2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length of Stay After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Conversely, guidelines for SHD triage have not explicitly characterized the use of resources along with treatment urgency and patient risk. [24][25][26] PEARLS triage schema categorizes four elements: (1) patient goals, benefit and risk stratification; (2) patient acuity; (3) patient estimated resource utilization, emphasizing periprocedural risk stratification and procedural needs, anticipated length of stay, discharge disposition, and patient needs for recovery; [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and (4) capacity and provision (restriction) of services 21,24 ( Figure 2). Triage criteria are differentiated prior to ( Figure 3) and after treatment ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Triage Incorporates Acuity Risk Stratification and Resourcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Conversely, guidelines for SHD triage have not explicitly characterized the use of resources along with treatment urgency and patient risk. [24][25][26] PEARLS triage schema categorizes four elements: (1) patient goals, benefit and risk stratification; (2) patient acuity; (3) patient estimated resource utilization, emphasizing periprocedural risk stratification and procedural needs, anticipated length of stay, discharge disposition, and patient needs for recovery; [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and (4) capacity and provision (restriction) of services 21,24 ( Figure 2). Triage criteria are differentiated prior to ( Figure 3) and after treatment ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Triage Incorporates Acuity Risk Stratification and Resourcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,44 Risks and predictors of procedural complications or prolonged length of stay are reviewed in Figure 3. 27,28 At a minimum, follow-up (Phase 4) is required at 30 days and 1 year after discharge due to the quality registry and payer requirements. Triage after the procedure determines whether a follow-up visit sooner or more frequently is warranted.…”
Section: Treatment and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In the current medical landscape, there is a trend toward earlier hospital discharge following TAVR, a key improvement in post-TAVR clinical workflow that involves the development and implementation of risk stratification protocols to reliably identify patients at incremental risk for requiring a PPM or an extended monitoring. 3 How to cite this article: Velagapudi P, Turagam MK. Utility of rapid atrial pacing before and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement to predict permanent pacemaker implantation: a valuable piece of the puzzle?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, TTE is easy to perform and is probably not a major variable affecting the length of stay after TAVI. Rates of delayed discharge continue to shrink in recent years owing to the countrywide adoption of “minimalistic TAVI.” In one analysis, predictors of delayed discharge include advanced age, frailty, use of self‐expanding valves, and surgical cut down for vascular access 5 . It is unlikely that elimination of predischarge TTE would carry little significance in influencing length of stay in these circumstances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one analysis, predictors of delayed discharge include advanced age, frailty, use of self-expanding valves, and surgical cut down for vascular access. 5 It is unlikely that elimination of predischarge TTE would carry little significance in influencing length of stay in these circumstances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%