2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01890.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships and length at first maturity for fish species in the upper Miranda River, southern Pantanal wetland, Brazil

Abstract: Length-weight relationships (LWR) were estimated for 17 species and total length at first maturity (L50) for three species of freshwater fishes from the Miranda River, southern Pantanal, Brazil. The b values were compared for some species in the Paraguay River basin with the northern (Cuiaba´River) part of the basin; differences in length-weight relationships were significantly different for Pseudoplatystoma corruscans, P. reticulatum (syn. P. fasciatum). First references on L50 and LWR are presented for two a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The regression parameter b of LWRs for each reported species was found within the expected normal range of 2.5 < b < 3.5, as compared to the Bayesian LWRs predictions approach in FishBase (Froese, 2006). For T. lalius (b = 3.17), N. meni (b = 3.38) and L. annandalei (b = 3.27), b > 3 indicates that these three species grow more in weight than in length; whereas for B. Dario (b = 2.87), b < 3 indicates that this species shared more energy to axial growth than to biomass, and helps them to escape predators and to search for food (Liu, Ye, & Li, 2016;Vicentin, dos S Costa, & Súarez, 2012). However, scientific findings revealed that the b value of the same species may vary by a number of factors, including seasonality, selectivity of the gear, habitat, gonadal maturity, sex, stomach fullness, diet, health and environmental conditions (Chaklader, Siddik, & Nahar, 2015;Froese, 2006;Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Fotedar, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regression parameter b of LWRs for each reported species was found within the expected normal range of 2.5 < b < 3.5, as compared to the Bayesian LWRs predictions approach in FishBase (Froese, 2006). For T. lalius (b = 3.17), N. meni (b = 3.38) and L. annandalei (b = 3.27), b > 3 indicates that these three species grow more in weight than in length; whereas for B. Dario (b = 2.87), b < 3 indicates that this species shared more energy to axial growth than to biomass, and helps them to escape predators and to search for food (Liu, Ye, & Li, 2016;Vicentin, dos S Costa, & Súarez, 2012). However, scientific findings revealed that the b value of the same species may vary by a number of factors, including seasonality, selectivity of the gear, habitat, gonadal maturity, sex, stomach fullness, diet, health and environmental conditions (Chaklader, Siddik, & Nahar, 2015;Froese, 2006;Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Fotedar, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regression constant (b) values lie between the ranges of (2.204 to 3.375). Fish with b value less than 3consumed more of its energy in axial growth rather than weight [5]. Mystus gulio, Lates calcarifer, Acanthopagrus latus, Brachirus orientalis and Mugil cephalus showed negative allometry in Narreri lagoon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The analysis of length-weight relationships (LWRs) and condition factors are common tools in studies of fish biology, ecology, and physiology, and they have been extensively used in fishery research and management [1][2][3][4]. LWRs enable the picturing of a specific population, irrespective of individual variation giving an idea of the condition [5] and fitness of the population [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%