2015
DOI: 10.1111/jai.12836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships for eight fish species from the Ravi River, north-western India

Abstract: Length-weight relationships (LWRs) were evaluated for Badis badis (n = 25), Sperata seenghala (n = 26), Labeo gonius (n = 34), Rasbora rasbora (n = 30), Bagarius bagarius (n = 24), Gagata cenia (n = 27), Glyptothorax stoliczkae (n = 24) and Channa orientalis (n = 28) from the Ravi River tributary in North India. Altogether 218 samples of eight species were obtained between May and November 2014 using cast nets and gill nets. LWRs for these species were unknown to FishBase, and new maximum lengths were recorded… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the estimated value of b for O. pabo was a little bit higher while A. caninus was lower than the value reported in FishBase. The estimated b value was 3.17 for G. cenia which is almost similar in Ravi River (3.15), north western India (Sharma, Mir, Singh, Akhtar, & Pandey, 2015). These variations could be related to different environmental and biological factors such as temperature, salinity, food (quantity, quality and size), habitat and gonad development, spawning period season, sex, season, stomach fullness, length range of sampled specimens and health Lim, Chong, Lim, & Yurimoto, 2014;Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Fotedar, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, the estimated value of b for O. pabo was a little bit higher while A. caninus was lower than the value reported in FishBase. The estimated b value was 3.17 for G. cenia which is almost similar in Ravi River (3.15), north western India (Sharma, Mir, Singh, Akhtar, & Pandey, 2015). These variations could be related to different environmental and biological factors such as temperature, salinity, food (quantity, quality and size), habitat and gonad development, spawning period season, sex, season, stomach fullness, length range of sampled specimens and health Lim, Chong, Lim, & Yurimoto, 2014;Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Fotedar, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Of the 12 fish species, information on LWRs was not available for six species in the FishBase online database (Froese & Pauly, ). Previously reported b values of LWRs were 3.01 for C. orientalis (Sharma, Mir, Singh, Akhtar, & Pandey, ), 3.02 for M. pancalus , 3.12 for N. nandus (Hossain, Ahmed, Leunda, Roksanul Islam et al., ), 2.92 for P. ticto (Hossain, Jasmine et al., ) and 2.79 for T. fasciata (Hossain & Afroze, ); these were all lower than in our present study (Table ). In addition, a previously noted b value for the LWR of H. fossilis was 3.14 (Khan, Khan, & Miyan, ), which was higher than in our present findings (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Understanding of the length-weight relationships (LWRs) and lengthlength relationships (LLRs) in fisheries science is necessary to estimate the biomass (Altin, Ayyildiz, Kale, & Alver, 2015;Froese, 2006;Froese, Tsikliras, & Stergiou, 2011;Hasankhani, Keivany, Daliri, Pouladi, & Soofiani, 2014;Sharma, Mir, Singh, Akhtar, & Pandey, 2015), and management and assessment of stocks that are important tools in fishery research (Ak, Kutlu, & Aydın, 2009). This relationship is generally presented by the equation W = aL b .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%