2017
DOI: 10.1111/jai.13540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships of nine rarely occurring carangids in the northern Arabian Sea coast of Pakistan

Abstract: SummaryIn this paper, we document length-weight relationships (LWRs) for nine rarely occur- | MATERIALS AND METHODS This | RESULTSThe data of nine carangids used to estimate LWRs parameters such as length range, weight range, sample size (n), values of intercept, slope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated length-weight relationship, W = 0.041*L 2.732 , indicated a hypoallometric progression of weight as individual grew in length, which was within the range (2.25 to 2.85) of earlier studies from the wild [16, 23]. But this alone does not give an indication of the quality of growth the organism experienced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The estimated length-weight relationship, W = 0.041*L 2.732 , indicated a hypoallometric progression of weight as individual grew in length, which was within the range (2.25 to 2.85) of earlier studies from the wild [16, 23]. But this alone does not give an indication of the quality of growth the organism experienced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The growth in a natural system (LWR), like in open seas, can be used to estimate the standard weight which can be compared with weight gain in captivity to evaluate the growth realization in rearing systems. The LWR reported in [16] was used to estimate the standard weight for the equivalent length of the sampledfish. The proportion of recorded sample above the standard weight estimated from LWR from the wild of similar climatic regime could be used as an index of growth in captivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The b value of LWR of five marine fish species were within the range (2.5–3.5) recommended by Froese (2006) for aquatic species. Previous recorded b value of A. atropos from India (2.859), China (3.021) and Pakistan (2.869) were lower than our results (Qamar & Panhwar, 2018; Reuben et al., 1992; Xu et al., 1994). Our estimated b value (2.589) for J. coitor was lower than previous finding (3.246) from the Ganga river, India (Verma et al., 2018) but higher than the study of Basumatary et al.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The estimated coefficients 'a' and 'b' of blackbanded trevally were within the expected range estimated for different fish species (Froese, 2006). Marginally higher values of 'a' (0.040) and 'b' (2.766) were reported for S. nigrofasciata from northern Arabian Sea coast of Pakistan (Qamar and Panhwar, 2017). This variation in the degree of growth between the geographical locations could be due to the availability of food, diet selectivity, ecological conditions and physiology of animals (Bhattacharya and Acharya 1984;Jaiswar and Kulkarni, 2002;Froese, 2006).…”
Section: Length-weight Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 72%