2017
DOI: 10.1111/jai.13595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships of three fish species from the Arial Khan River, an outlet of the river Padma, Bangladesh

Abstract: Summary The present study narrated the length–weight relationships (LWRs) of three fish species Salmophasia sardinella (Valenciennes, 1844), Amblypharyngodon microlepis (Bleeker, 1853) and Macrognathus aral (Bloch & Scheider, 1801) from the Arial Khan River, a south‐eastward outlet of the river Padma, Bangladesh. Fish samples were collected monthly basis from fishermen who used cast nets (mesh size <0.5 cm) and set bag nets (mesh size 0.5 cm) for catching fish species from January to December, 2016. The growth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the study period, specimens of each species from juvenile and adult stage were examined to attain a better species‐specific estimate (Rastgoo, Fatemi,Valinassab, & Mortazavi, ; Siddik et al, ). The estimated values of coefficient of allometry ( b ) of three species remained within the expected limits of 2.5 to 3.5, which are in line with the finding of other researchers (Froese, ; Siddik, Hanif, & Chaklader, ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Mahmud, ; Siddik, Hanif, Nahar, Chaklader, & Kleindienst, ). The coefficient of allometry ( b ) for A. longispinnis was 3.192, which exceeded the Bayesian prediction (2.95) based on sub family body shape (Froese, Thorson, & Reyes, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…During the study period, specimens of each species from juvenile and adult stage were examined to attain a better species‐specific estimate (Rastgoo, Fatemi,Valinassab, & Mortazavi, ; Siddik et al, ). The estimated values of coefficient of allometry ( b ) of three species remained within the expected limits of 2.5 to 3.5, which are in line with the finding of other researchers (Froese, ; Siddik, Hanif, & Chaklader, ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Mahmud, ; Siddik, Hanif, Nahar, Chaklader, & Kleindienst, ). The coefficient of allometry ( b ) for A. longispinnis was 3.192, which exceeded the Bayesian prediction (2.95) based on sub family body shape (Froese, Thorson, & Reyes, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The a and b value of al species in the present study were between the expected range predicted by Froese () and 95% confidence limits of the Bayesian LWR prediction value in Fishbase (Froese & Pauly, ). Parameter b > 3.0 is the indication of highly nourished adult specimens, b = 3.0 indicates similar growth pattern from small to larger size population and b < 3.0 indicates faster growth in length than weight and robustness of small‐sized specimens (Siddik, Hanif, & Chaklader, ). The value of slope b can differ mainly due to several environmental (habitat, season), arti‐factual (length type, size range, specimen number) and biological (sex, maturation of gonad, diet, degree of stomach fullness, growth phase) factors (De La Cruz‐Agüero, Moncayo‐ Estrada, Chollet‐Villalpando, & Cota‐Gómez, ; Hanif et al, ; Nahar, Hanif, Siddik, Chaklader, & Islam, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All regressions of LWRs for three species were highly significant ( p < 0.001) with r 2 value>0.95 which demonstrates proper fitness of model as regression coefficient close to 1 indicates a tight correlation of the data (Hanif, Siddik, Chaklader, Pham, & Kleindienst, ). The calculated value of “ b” for all three species variated within the expected limit 2.5–3.5 (Hanif, Islam, Siddik, & Chaklader, ; Islam et al, ; Nahar, Hanif, Siddik, Chaklader, & Islam, ; Siddik, Hanif, & Chaklader, ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Mahmud, ). For A. vari , b ≈ 3 which indicates that small size individuals in the sample have similar form as larger size one (Froese, ; Jabeen, Choudhury, & Sarma, ) while for U. uraspis and C. oblongus , b < 3 indicates both the species grow faster in length compared to weight and small‐sized individuals were in good nutritional condition during the sampling period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%