2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01234.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lengths of hepatitis B viremia and antigenemia in blood donors: preliminary evidence of occult (hepatitis B surface antigen–negative) infection in the acute stage

Abstract: Transmission of mutant virus may cause occult HBV infection in the acute stage. HBV NAT, even in MP configuration, is more effective than HBsAg testing and capable of interdicting infected donors in the pre- and post-HBsAg window periods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
83
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Manzini and colleagues reported a blood donor who tested HBV NAT positive but did not develop detectable HBsAg over a period of 97 days despite anti-HBc and antiHBs seroconversion [40]. Three cases of OBI in the acute stage have been reported from the Japanese Red Cross but viral loads were >10 4 copies/mL ( J 10 3 IU/mL) and S escape mutants could not be ruled out in one of the donors [41].…”
Section: Hbv Nucleic Acid Testing (Nat)mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Manzini and colleagues reported a blood donor who tested HBV NAT positive but did not develop detectable HBsAg over a period of 97 days despite anti-HBc and antiHBs seroconversion [40]. Three cases of OBI in the acute stage have been reported from the Japanese Red Cross but viral loads were >10 4 copies/mL ( J 10 3 IU/mL) and S escape mutants could not be ruled out in one of the donors [41].…”
Section: Hbv Nucleic Acid Testing (Nat)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This applies only to repeat donors who made more than one donation during the study period, and it may underestimate the risk as first time donors might be at greater risk of infection than repeat donors [56]. The most common approach is to measure seroconversion to HBsAg despite the rapid disappearance of this marker in a few months after infection in 95% of immunocompetent adults [41]. Therefore, a newly infected donor would not be identified as such if HBsAg is cleared from the blood between donations and true HBV infection incidence will be underestimated.…”
Section: Estimation Of Hbv Residual Transfusion Transmission Riskmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The observed discrep- ancies could be also explained by the limitations of serological tests, considering their inability to detect HBsAg in some cases (with several molecular explanations) (20). Also, with low HBsAg expression, it is often possible to find a person undetectable by this antigen, but positive for AbHBc with a very low viral load (21)(22)(23). Consequently, sole evaluation of HBsAg may not be the optimal strategy to define the state of a carrier in a study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleic acid testing (NAT) has been adopted in many OPOs as an adjunct to traditional serologic testing. NAT is extremely sensitive for active viremia and will allow safe transplantation of organs from donors with higher social and infectious risks (9). Such donors may represent up to 5% of the donor pool and may provide significant societal and recipi- ent benefits (10).…”
Section: Pancreas Transplant Patient and Allograft Survival Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%