2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/286949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LeopardPanthera pardus fuscaDensity in the Seasonally Dry, Subtropical Forest in the Bhabhar of Terai Arc, Nepal

Abstract: We estimated leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) abundance and density in the Bhabhar physiographic region in Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. The camera trap grid, covering sampling area of 289 km2 with 88 locations, accumulated 1,342 trap nights in 64 days in the winter season of 2008-2009 and photographed 19 individual leopards. Using models incorporating heterogeneity, we estimated 28 (±SE 6.07) and 29.58 (±SE 10.44) leopards in Programs CAPTURE and MARK. Density estimates via 1/2 MMDM methods were 5.61 (±SE 1.3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Camera-trapping techniques using a capture-recapture framework (O'Connell et al 2010) have proven very effective in estimating population size and density of elusive and cryptic large carnivores such as tigers (Panthera tigris) in India (Karanth 1995;Karanth and Nichols 1998) and Sumatra (Sunarto et al 2013), jaguars (Panthera onca) in Belize (Silver et al 2004) and Brazil (Silveira et al 2010), and leopards (Panthera pardus) in Nepal (Thapa et al 2014) and South Africa (Balme et al 2009). Camera trapping for carnivores, especially felids, is now widely used for abundance and density estimation and greatly improves our understanding of wildlife population status (Meek et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camera-trapping techniques using a capture-recapture framework (O'Connell et al 2010) have proven very effective in estimating population size and density of elusive and cryptic large carnivores such as tigers (Panthera tigris) in India (Karanth 1995;Karanth and Nichols 1998) and Sumatra (Sunarto et al 2013), jaguars (Panthera onca) in Belize (Silver et al 2004) and Brazil (Silveira et al 2010), and leopards (Panthera pardus) in Nepal (Thapa et al 2014) and South Africa (Balme et al 2009). Camera trapping for carnivores, especially felids, is now widely used for abundance and density estimation and greatly improves our understanding of wildlife population status (Meek et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tiger and leopard photographs obtained in camera-traps were systematically sorted in separate folders. Paired camera-traps at each sampling point obtained photos of both flanks of tigers and leopards in most of the events (~ 80%) which enabled us to identify individuals accurately based on their coat marking patterns (Karanth and Nicholas 1998;Thapa et al 2014). Because paired cameras operated independently, ~ 20% of capture events were composed of photos of a single flank.…”
Section: Camera-trap Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Churia habitat is adjacent to a southern valley with a human population density of 440 per km 2 (CBS 2011). The Churia habitat is the main corridor joining the Valmiki Tiger Reserve in India and the Parsa Wildlife Reserve in the east to form a Tiger Conservation Landscape (TCL) (Wikramanayake et al 2004) known as Chitwan-Valmiki-Parsa Tiger Landscape (Chanchani et al 2014b;Thapa et al 2014).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%