1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1986.tb00039.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leporid social behaviour and social organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
58
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(37 reference statements)
4
58
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on different taxa have noted that foraging behaviour is not only motivated by maximum acquisition of nutrients but also by predator avoidance, because whether a prey species (like lagomorphs) increases or decreases its vigilance rate, thereby sacrificing or increasing its foraging activity, may depend on how secure the species senses it is in its habitat structure (Barbour and Litvaitis 1993;Kie 1999;Smith and Litvaitis 2000;Bond et al 2001). The two species exhibited contrasting dependence on cover for protection against predators during feeding due to their different anti-predator strategies: hares use long-distance running to escape from terrestrial predators while cottontails run away for short distances to shelter in the nearest dense cover (Cowan and Bell 1986;Fa et al 1992;Althoff et al 1997). In autumn, the substantial overlap in resource use between the two species at both the macro-and the micro-habitat level supports the evidence for the negative effect of resource availability reduction on hare and cottontail spatial distribution within simplified agro-ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on different taxa have noted that foraging behaviour is not only motivated by maximum acquisition of nutrients but also by predator avoidance, because whether a prey species (like lagomorphs) increases or decreases its vigilance rate, thereby sacrificing or increasing its foraging activity, may depend on how secure the species senses it is in its habitat structure (Barbour and Litvaitis 1993;Kie 1999;Smith and Litvaitis 2000;Bond et al 2001). The two species exhibited contrasting dependence on cover for protection against predators during feeding due to their different anti-predator strategies: hares use long-distance running to escape from terrestrial predators while cottontails run away for short distances to shelter in the nearest dense cover (Cowan and Bell 1986;Fa et al 1992;Althoff et al 1997). In autumn, the substantial overlap in resource use between the two species at both the macro-and the micro-habitat level supports the evidence for the negative effect of resource availability reduction on hare and cottontail spatial distribution within simplified agro-ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…paratuberculosis found by sampling at different spatial scales may be explained by looking at the socioecology of rabbits. Rabbits live in social groups of between 2 and 20 adults (average, 10); each social group inhabits its own warren (8), which is often located near other warrens to form a contiguous area of social groups which is referred to here as a bank. In the course of their daily routine, rabbits will range up to an average of 200 m from their warrens (11) and often will intermingle with individuals from other social groups in their bank but rarely with individuals from other banks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the animal reaches this age the musculature of the chewing system, which develops from that used to suckle, is indistinguishable from that of an adult (Weijs et al, 1989;Langenbach et al, 1992Langenbach et al, , 2001) and the young rabbits are able to feed for themselves. At this point they receive no further maternal care, and are expelled from the burrow in which they were born (Cowan and Bell, 1986;Villafuerte, 2007). Remains that show deciduous teeth are therefore those of infant rabbits e individuals that could never have been taken from their burrows by a bird of prey and must therefore have been killed by a terrestrial predator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%