1982
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leptospirosis in Man, Israel, 1970–1979

Abstract: In 1970-1979, the incidence of human leptospirosis in Israel was 0.7 per 100,000 population. The majority of the cases (62%) occurred in northeastern Israel (Upper Galilee). Prior to 1973 the main infecting serotypes were grippotyphosa (41%) and Hebdomadis szwajizak (31%). Following the first outbreak of Hebdomadis hardjo infection in 1973, a change occurred in the epidemiologic pattern of human leptospirosis, with hardjo becoming the most common serotype (59%). Hardjo infection outbreaks were sporadic and loc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Nicaraguan epidemic was associated with the Canicola serogroup [42]. Although infection with serovars from the Icterohemorrhagiae serogroup has been reported to be associated with increased disease severity [35,43], a number of published case series have questioned the relationship between infecting serogroups and disease severity [32,44,45]. In the current series, a clear association between infection with Icterohemorrhagiae and increased severity of illness was demonstrated (table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Nicaraguan epidemic was associated with the Canicola serogroup [42]. Although infection with serovars from the Icterohemorrhagiae serogroup has been reported to be associated with increased disease severity [35,43], a number of published case series have questioned the relationship between infecting serogroups and disease severity [32,44,45]. In the current series, a clear association between infection with Icterohemorrhagiae and increased severity of illness was demonstrated (table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The majority of case series published elsewhere either contained all case reports in their analysis, including those without laboratory confirmation [29,30], or utilized a variety of less specific case definitions for the purposes of confirmation [31][32][33][34][35][36]. The use of consistent laboratory criteria allow for valid comparisons between clinical and epidemiologic patterns of leptospirosis in different populations [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These infections were predominantly with the serovar icterohaemorrhagiae with the classical symptoms of meningitis, nephritis and hepatitis. Now in the United Kingdom [6,7], as in New Zealand [8] and Israel [9], the Sejroe strain from cattle (serovar hardjo) is the one most commonly reported and is associated more frequently with influenza-like symptoms. A study of farmers in different parts of England [6] showed that 5 % of 709 blood samples had antibody to serovar hardjo % in dairy farmers, [3][4][5][6][7] % in beef producers and 1'6 % in arable farmers).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 The majority of previously published case series either included all case reports in their analysis, including those without laboratory confirmation, 59,60 or used a variety of less specific case definitions for the purposes of confirmation, including a single MAT titer Ն 1:100, 58,62 any increase or decrease in titer against one or more serotypes, 58 MAT seroconversion (a negative result in the first serum sample and a titer Ն 1:100 in the second sample), 72,73 an MAT titer Ͼ 1:200 with an increase/decrease in a subsequent serum specimen, 74 a single MAT titer Ն 1:400, 72 or a single MAT titer Ͼ 1:400. 75 It is important to differentiate confirmed from probable, presumptive, or suspect cases to optimally characterize leptospirosis epidemiologically. The use of consistent diagnostic criteria is also necessary to allow for valid comparisons between different cases series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%