1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-6995(89)80115-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les lemmings fossiles du genre Lemmus (Arvicolidae, Rodentia)dans le pléistocène de France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the lack of diagnostic criteria between closely related taxa raises the question of how to use morphological characters for species identification adequately (Nadachowski 1984;Kochev 1986;Chaline et al 1989;Smirnov et al 1997;Carrasco 2000, Semken & Wallace 2002Markova & Borodin 2005;Borodin 2009). Sibling species that are extremely similar in appearance but are nonetheless reproductively isolated appear to be the most problematic to identify in the fossil record.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the lack of diagnostic criteria between closely related taxa raises the question of how to use morphological characters for species identification adequately (Nadachowski 1984;Kochev 1986;Chaline et al 1989;Smirnov et al 1997;Carrasco 2000, Semken & Wallace 2002Markova & Borodin 2005;Borodin 2009). Sibling species that are extremely similar in appearance but are nonetheless reproductively isolated appear to be the most problematic to identify in the fossil record.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often claimed that a multivariate morphological approach is applicable to the differentiation of closely related species of micromammals in the fossil record (Chaline et al 1989;Smirnov et al 1997;Leroy et al 2004;Polly & Head 2004;Tobin 2004;Wallace 2006;McGuire 2009). However, the taxonomic inferences from multivariate morphological analyses of fossil data have never been tested using any independent technique for taxonomic identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrences of M. schisticolor have already been suggested for European Early and Middle Pleistocene sites at Boxgrove (England;Roberts and Parfitt, 1999) and Vergranne (France; Chaline et al, 1989) and suspicions of its presence (records of Myopus/Lemmus) have been raised in Chlum-4 (Czech Republic; Kowalski, 2001), Nyaravai-2 (Lithuania; Kowalski, 2001) and Sudmer-Berg 2 (Germany; von Koenigswald, 1972). In general, these suspicions are based on both the morphology of the teeth and on the faunal associations, which are characteristic of a forest environment.…”
Section: Myopus Fossil Identifications: Palaeobiogeographical Implicamentioning
confidence: 95%