LES of density ratio effects on film cooling under rotating frame

Al-Zurfi, Nabeel; Turan, Ali

doi:10.1007/s00231-015-1576-5

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, for lower blowing ratios, the kidney vortices are detached from the wall as getting away from the centerline and this decreases the power of the CRVP, so that leads to remaining the injection flow close the surface, and aids remarkably improving the film cooling effect, and as a result, a higher effectiveness is acquired. 8–10,38,39…”

Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of pulse injection on film cooling performance: Experimental and numerical investigation

Abadi

Zirak

Zargarabad

2021

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, the influence of pulsating air on film cooling of a flat plate at different frequencies and blowing ratios are experimentally and numerically investigated. Square wave pulsed flow is generated at four frequencies of 2, 10, 50, and 100 Hz corresponding to Strouhal numbers of 0.00254, 0.0127, 0.0636, and 0.1271, respectively, and at five blowing ratios of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.4, and 3. Reynolds-averaged Navier−Stokes equations are resolved to analyze the coolant film effectiveness based on parameters set in the experiments. The [Formula: see text] model used for turbulent modeling. The obtained results showed that the performance of pulsating cooling decreases with increasing of blowing ratio at the same flow as steady state conditions. The difference between numerical and experimental values for the centerline film effectiveness shows good adaptation at the distances of the injection hole downstream. The lift-off of the local jet increased under pulsation. Increasing the pulse frequency increases the overall efficiency of film cooling. The maximum mean centerline pulsating film cooling effectiveness is obtained at Strouhal number of 0.0636 and a blowing ratio of 0.5, and the minimum value is for Strouhal number of 0.00254 and a blowing ratio of 3. For pulsed flow, the maximum discrepancy of the mean centerline film effectiveness between experimental and numerical results was 17.82%.

show abstract

Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%