2019
DOI: 10.3917/ried.239.0057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les paradoxes de la résilience en matière de sécurité alimentaire

Abstract: L'article analyse les correspondances et les décalages entre la pensée sur la résilience dans la littérature et la façon dont on traite de résilience en matière de développement et de sécurité alimentaire dans les projets et dans les guides pratiques d'évaluation. Six paradoxes sont soulevés à propos :

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deliberate SES transformation implies that the stakeholders acquire "transformative capacity" (Olsson et al, 2010), that is, "the capacity of individuals and organizations to be able to transform both themselves and their society in a deliberate, conscious way" (Ziervogel et al, 2016, p. 2). This is especially important insofar as resilience is often understood in a normative manner (Fallot et al, 2019). However, it is also important to define what resilience is about and by whom it is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deliberate SES transformation implies that the stakeholders acquire "transformative capacity" (Olsson et al, 2010), that is, "the capacity of individuals and organizations to be able to transform both themselves and their society in a deliberate, conscious way" (Ziervogel et al, 2016, p. 2). This is especially important insofar as resilience is often understood in a normative manner (Fallot et al, 2019). However, it is also important to define what resilience is about and by whom it is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there are many possible ways to increase the resilience of an agrifood system and many possible resilience criteria. Every stakeholder of the system should be able to position himself/herself with regard to the trajectory of the agrifood system (Fallot et al, 2019). Beyond the need to cross-compare the different perspectives and to foster learning from trial and error, it seems important not to consider resilience as a given property of the system, the boundaries and conditions of which would be perfectly known, but rather to consider it as an "object" of collective design and elaboration .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%