2008
DOI: 10.3917/rindu.082.0103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les pôles de compétitivité à l'heure de l'évaluation : quel modèle de « cluster à la française » ?

Abstract: De par le caractère encore récent des pôles, une grille d’évaluation quantitative qui met l’accent uniquement sur des critères de performance peut ne pas refléter les réalités spécifiques de certains pôles. Une approche relationnelle, qui souligne l’antériorité et la nature des relations entre acteurs impliqués dans les pôles, paraît plus appropriée au stade actuel d’évolution de ces structures. Le facteur discriminant serait alors non pas la productivité du travail au sein des pôles, mais bien, plutôt, cette … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Set up in 2005, French competitiveness clusters can be viewed as proactive tools of the government’s Research and Development (R&D) policy, whose main objectives are to help fund and foster innovative collaborative projects between firms, higher education hubs and public and private research units at the regional level (Brette and Chappoz, 2007). Such groupings − which Tixier and Castro-Gonçalves (2008) have called ‘Clusters à la française’ − include specific governance bodies (General Assembly, Board of Directors, Technical Committees), while central authorities retain important roles in setting clusters up and financing the R&D projects that they certify (Brette and Chappoz, 2007). In 2012, the 71 French competitiveness clusters accounted for 835,000 jobs, 1 corresponding to 3.2 percent of the total number of French employees, and accounted for 4.5 percent of total public and private R&D expenditures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Set up in 2005, French competitiveness clusters can be viewed as proactive tools of the government’s Research and Development (R&D) policy, whose main objectives are to help fund and foster innovative collaborative projects between firms, higher education hubs and public and private research units at the regional level (Brette and Chappoz, 2007). Such groupings − which Tixier and Castro-Gonçalves (2008) have called ‘Clusters à la française’ − include specific governance bodies (General Assembly, Board of Directors, Technical Committees), while central authorities retain important roles in setting clusters up and financing the R&D projects that they certify (Brette and Chappoz, 2007). In 2012, the 71 French competitiveness clusters accounted for 835,000 jobs, 1 corresponding to 3.2 percent of the total number of French employees, and accounted for 4.5 percent of total public and private R&D expenditures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les pôles de compétitivité se distinguent néanmoins des clusters nord-américains sur plusieurs points. La différence la plus importante est la forte implication des pouvoirs publics au sein des pôles (Retour, 2009 ;Tixier et Castro Gonçalves, 2008). Contrairement aux clusters, c'est l'État qui est à l'origine des pôles de compétitivité et qui occupe un rôle majeur dans le financement de ces activités.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…However since its implementation, the competitiveness cluster raises many questions in scientific communities. One of the first concerns is the issue of its governance and coordination of different actors (Tixier & Castro-Gonçalves, 2008;Défélix et al, 2009;Gomez, 2009;Retour, 2009). Indeed, each competitiveness cluster has its own mode of governance, in most cases, an association composed of industrial actors, academic and local authorities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%