Faire Ou Faire-Faire ?
DOI: 10.4000/books.pur.23820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les services dans la parenté : fonctions, régulation, effets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
6

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…c) The family tie presents definite specificities, creating a situation whereby the services exchanged among kin noticeably differ from the forms of support provided by public services, especially in terms of availability, diversity, permanence and cost (Pitrou, 1987;Dechaux, 1996). Furthermore, it has been observed that this bond leads to a kind of flexible reciprocity, often deferred in time and functioning as a sort of "insurance scheme" over the long-term but quite vague and with no guaranties (Coenen-Huther et al, 1994;Godbout and Charbonneau, 1996;Déchaux, 1996). Gift and counter-gift relationships bind individuals to one another, as opposed to mercantile relationships where the exchange ends as soon as one party repays its debt.…”
Section: Overview Of Family Solidarities: State Of the Art In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c) The family tie presents definite specificities, creating a situation whereby the services exchanged among kin noticeably differ from the forms of support provided by public services, especially in terms of availability, diversity, permanence and cost (Pitrou, 1987;Dechaux, 1996). Furthermore, it has been observed that this bond leads to a kind of flexible reciprocity, often deferred in time and functioning as a sort of "insurance scheme" over the long-term but quite vague and with no guaranties (Coenen-Huther et al, 1994;Godbout and Charbonneau, 1996;Déchaux, 1996). Gift and counter-gift relationships bind individuals to one another, as opposed to mercantile relationships where the exchange ends as soon as one party repays its debt.…”
Section: Overview Of Family Solidarities: State Of the Art In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les attributs attendus de leurs prestations envers tous les proches †: parents, amis, voisins… se rapprochent alors des caractéristiques du travail familial. Les spécificités du travail de famille analysées par Jean-Hugues Déchaux (1994Déchaux ( , 1996, à savoir l'accessibilité, la polyvalence, la plasticité, la confiance, et dans une certaine mesure la gratuité ou tout au moins la dynamique du don, peuvent être retrouvées dans ces pratiques.…”
Section: Lien Social Et Politiques -Riac 51unclassified
“…La institución au pair puede ser vista, por tanto, como un espacio de experimentación social, en el que emergen todas las contradicciones y asimetrías del modelo de asistencia familista mediterráneo, suspendido entre la necesidad de asistencia y cuidado, la falta de parientes y la falta de recursos para mantener figuras profesionales. En este modelo la asistencia asume un idioma familiar, pero, como han evidenciado algunos estudios (Caradec, 1996;Déchaux, 1996;De Ridder y Legrand, 1996), esto crea una situación bastante contradictoria en la que las figuras de ayuda externa a la familia son llamadas a ser al mismo tiempo profesionales e íntimas. Además, como hemos anteriormente evidenciado haciendo referencia a Sahlins (1965;, el tipo de transacciones que estas figuras ponen en acto pueden ser consideradas al mismo tiempo pertenecientes al ámbito de lo familiar o de lo económico, creando por tanto confusión sobre la distancia y el rango parental.…”
Section: Conclusión: Las Contradicciones Au Pair Entre La Construcciunclassified