Les sondages et la transformation de l'opinion publique

Ginsberg, Benjamin

doi:10.4267/2042/14552

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this regard, beside the 'aggregated public opinion', two other notions of public opinions existed and can be classified under the label of public opinion as 'public discussion' or 'collective action'. The first refers to the collective (and not individual) product of a public discussion on a topic of general interest (Habermas, 1962); the second instead reflects a collective voice (even in the minority, but expressed with strong intensity), mobilized by an organized group, in opposition to or in support of a specific political or social cause (Blumer, 1948;Ginsberg, 2001).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Activated public opinion

Ceron

2022

Elgar Encyclopedia of Technology and Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Activated public opinion

Ceron

2022

Elgar Encyclopedia of Technology and Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending

Jacoby¹

2000

American Journal of Political Science

447

272

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rapport dialogique et répertoire de réponses

Lemoine

Laurens

2012

Les Cahiers Internationaux De Psychologie Sociale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audience

This study mobilises the psychosocial glance (Moscovici, 1984) and dialogical approach (Marková, 2005) to consider opinion. The main purpose is to test the existence of an answers directory fed by our dialogues with others. The subject «would assume the attitude of others» (Mead, 1934) to take a stand towards an object. These answers must be shared and significant. The results show that 83.1 % of them can imagine others and their position towards an object. These answers constitute the directory from which the subject elaborate its own opinion.

Cette étude mobilise le regard psychosocial (Moscovici, 1984) et l’approche dialogique (Marková, 2005) pour envisager l’opinion. L’objectif principal est de tester l’existence d’un répertoire de réponses alimenté par nos dialogues avec autrui. Le sujet «assumerait l’attitude d’autrui» (Mead, 1934) pour prendre position vis-à-vis d’un objet. Nous avons vérifié la capacité des participants (N=89) à identifier des autrui et leurs réponses. Ces réponses doivent être partagées et signifiantes. Les résultats montrent que 83.1% d’entre-eux peuvent imaginer des autrui et leur position vis-à-vis d’un objet. Ces réponses constituent les prises de position d’autrui dont dispose le sujet et ainsi le répertoire sur lequel il s’appuie pour élaborer sa propre opinion.

show abstract

Les sondages et la transformation de l'opinion publique

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Activated public opinion

Activated public opinion

Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending

Rapport dialogique et répertoire de réponses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About