2010
DOI: 10.3406/befeo.2010.6137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les Yasodharàsrama, marqueurs d'empire et bornes sacrées : conformité et spécificité des stèles digraphiques khmères de la région de Vat Phu

Abstract: L'épigraphie de Yasovarman Ier commémore la création, par ce roi, d'une centaine d''àsrama dans l'ensemble de son empire. Pourtant, malgré leur importance manifeste, nous serions bien en peine d'identifier ces lieux sans doute essentiellement construits en matériaux légers, s'ils n'étaient signalés par des inscriptions qui célèbrent leur fondation-les stèles digraphiques-, dont seize ont été identifiées à ce jour. Nous nous intéresserons ici à deux d'entre-elles qui proviennent de la région de Vat Phu : une st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were places of great power, and pilgrimages to deities of all backgrounds thus created a wide range of religious diversity in the landscape. The heterogeneity and reverence of local gods is clearly illustrated through the work of Yaśovarman I, who at the end of the 9th century claims to have built 100 āśramas on sites where powerful and renowned gods had already existed for a long time (Estève and Soutif 2011). The later Pre Rup inscription tells us that under king Rājendravarman in the 10th century, there was a pre-existing cult of '30 self-created gods (svayambhū)' (K. 806, IC I, st. CCLXX).…”
Section: Local Cults Sacred Places and The Web Of Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were places of great power, and pilgrimages to deities of all backgrounds thus created a wide range of religious diversity in the landscape. The heterogeneity and reverence of local gods is clearly illustrated through the work of Yaśovarman I, who at the end of the 9th century claims to have built 100 āśramas on sites where powerful and renowned gods had already existed for a long time (Estève and Soutif 2011). The later Pre Rup inscription tells us that under king Rājendravarman in the 10th century, there was a pre-existing cult of '30 self-created gods (svayambhū)' (K. 806, IC I, st. CCLXX).…”
Section: Local Cults Sacred Places and The Web Of Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have proposed that these sites were a type of neighborhood (Carter et al 2018). Archaeologists have also identified the habitation of other more specialized religious communities such as asramas, in which people may have been organized around religious study and practice (Chea 2018;Estève andSoutif 2010-2011;Pottier 2003). Investigations of non-temple enclosure residential spaces at Angkor have identified some pockets of long-lived habitation in the area dating from to the 9th-17th centuries AD (Brotherson 2019;Heng et al n.d.).…”
Section: Communities In An Urban Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a great deal that is remarkable about Yaśovarman's bold plan of social engineering by decreeing the creation of a hundred āśramas across his kingdom when he came to power in 889 CE (we do not know whether they were all created, as Estève and Soutif note), 72 but one thing that stands out is its conscious »ecumenism«, if we may borrow this Christian term into the realm of classical religions of Indian origin. 73 In his capital, four such āśramas were constructed 74 around the huge tank that bears his name, the Yaśodharataṭāka, and their largely identical charter-inscriptions reveal that they were Vaiṣṇava (K. 701, vaiṣṇavāśrama), Buddhist (K. 290, saugatāśrama) and Śaiva (K. 279, brāhmaṇāśrama, and K. 1228, māheśvarāśrama). 75…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%