2014
DOI: 10.1177/1363460714531432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesbian and gay youth and the question of labels

Abstract: Studies of non-heterosexual youth show a resistance to sexual labels. The term post-gay has been used to describe an identity undefined by labels, and is presented as evidence of a new sexual fluidity. Drawing on qualitative interviews with self-identified lesbian and gay youth from the north east of England, this article provides a different account of the use of labels. Instead of evidencing the rejection of labels, it shows how lesbian and gay young people use labels but question their meaning, adopting som… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sexuality questions in the SLJS query respondents about separate dimensions of sexuality (behavior, identity, and attraction). Our questions correspond to those asked in the NSFG and National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) but include response options informed by sexualities research showing that young people increasingly reject labels and state that their sexual orientation is not predominately defined by their partner’s gender (Coleman-Fountain 2014; Diamond 2008a, b; Savin-Williams and Vragalova 2013). 4 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sexuality questions in the SLJS query respondents about separate dimensions of sexuality (behavior, identity, and attraction). Our questions correspond to those asked in the NSFG and National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) but include response options informed by sexualities research showing that young people increasingly reject labels and state that their sexual orientation is not predominately defined by their partner’s gender (Coleman-Fountain 2014; Diamond 2008a, b; Savin-Williams and Vragalova 2013). 4 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used terms that clearly and consistently identify our three analytic groups, reflect meaningful distinctions among our respondents, and are common in research on sexuality and popular discourse (Coleman-Fountain 2014; Diamond 2008a, b; Savin-Williams and Vrangalova 2013). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As societal attitudes change towards LGBTQ people, corresponding changes in how LGBTQ people see themselves are also emerging . For some (particularly younger people), the new social context encourages a confident ‘post‐gay’ rejection of any labelling of sexual orientation or gender identity, while for others their LGBTQ identities remain relevant, even as they question those labels …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature suggests that post‐gay discourse has as many if not more critics as it does proponents. Despite the trends documented by scholars like Seidman () and Savin‐Williams (), the majority of contemporary research shows no precipitous decline in the use of sexual identity labels (e.g., Coleman‐Fountain, ; Forstie, ; Kellinger & Cover, ; Russell, Clarke, & Clary, ). Most people, including young people, continue to rely on these labels to classify themselves, though perhaps they do so with an understanding of sexual orientations as more porous and dynamic than traditional models of sexual identity development account for (Weststrate & McLean, ).…”
Section: Debunking Post‐gay Discoursementioning
confidence: 98%