2014
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesion correlates of patholinguistic profiles in chronic aphasia: comparisons of syndrome-, modality- and symptom-level assessment

Abstract: One way to investigate the neuronal underpinnings of language competence is to correlate patholinguistic profiles of aphasic patients to corresponding lesion sites. Constituting the beginnings of aphasiology and neurolinguistics over a century ago, this approach has been revived and refined in the past decade by statistical approaches mapping continuous variables (providing metrics that are not simply categorical) on voxel-wise lesion information (voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping). Here we investigate whethe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Dorsal/ventral dissociations have also been found in aphasic patients, where expressive impairments can occur at the lexical-semantic or lexical-phonological levels. Semantic impairments in aphasia can occur at different levels of language processing but have been associated with left temporal, and inferior frontal areas, while lexical-phonological difficulties occur after supramarginal and arcuate lesions (Henseler et al, 2014;Parker Jones et al, 2014). Our results suggest that dorsal/ventral dissociations found in aphasic patients can also be found in an unselected brain-damaged patients population and confirm the role of temporal structure in accessing the meaning of words.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dorsal/ventral dissociations have also been found in aphasic patients, where expressive impairments can occur at the lexical-semantic or lexical-phonological levels. Semantic impairments in aphasia can occur at different levels of language processing but have been associated with left temporal, and inferior frontal areas, while lexical-phonological difficulties occur after supramarginal and arcuate lesions (Henseler et al, 2014;Parker Jones et al, 2014). Our results suggest that dorsal/ventral dissociations found in aphasic patients can also be found in an unselected brain-damaged patients population and confirm the role of temporal structure in accessing the meaning of words.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of 30 neuropsychological studies including tests of verbal fluency in patients with brain damage indeed reports that while temporal structures are more important for semantic fluency, frontal damages impact similarly on phonologic and semantic fluency (Henry and Crawford, 2004). Of note, dorsal/ventral dissociations for phonologic and semantic processing have also been found related to other types of language impairments; deficits in oral expression can for example occur at the lexical-semantic or lexical-phonological levels (Henseler et al, 2014;Parker Jones et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supramarginal gyrus borders Wernicke's area at the posterior end of the superior temporal gyrus. Its lesions have been associated with defects of the phonological loop of verbal working memory (Baddeley, 2004;Leyton et al, in press);Henseler et al, 2014) but also with deficient comprehension and naming of categorical spatial relations and mechanically complex tools (Kemmerer et al, 2012;Pelgrims et al, 2013;Orban and Caruana, 2014;Watson and Buxbaum, 2015). It is remarkable that these symptoms include disturbances of spatial, semantic, and linguistic processing.…”
Section: Supramarginal and Angular Gyrusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aphasia recovery is generally predicted not only by size but also lesion location in critical language areas, logically a small lesion in a speech area is more likely to impact on language severity and recovery, while a large lesion elsewhere may affect speech minimally (Naeser et al 1998(Naeser et al , 1989Henseler et al 2014).…”
Section: Lesion Location and Sizementioning
confidence: 99%