2015
DOI: 10.3167/ares.2015.060109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Less Than One But More Than Many: Anthropocene as Science Fiction and Scholarship-in-the-Making

Abstract: How might one responsibly review a fi eld just coming into being-such as that provoked by the term Anthropocene? In this article, we argue for two strategies. First, working from the premise that the Anthropocene fi eld is best understood within its emergence, we review conferences rather than publications. In conference performances, we glimpse the themes and tensions of a fi eld-to-come. Second, we interpret Anthropocene as a science-fi ction concept, that is, one that pulls us out of familiar space and time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
37
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A most practical distillation of this arises in the discussion of a 'good' versus 'bad' Anthropocene (Hamilton, 2016 heating cannot but manifest the ongoing structural logics and momentum of inhuman, world-rending forces; for the latter, it can activate encounters with more-than-hu-2 Este cuerpo de literatura está creciendo y encamina de muchas formas diferentes la cuestión de lo real y de lo realmente "de otro modo". Ver, por ejemplo: Boes & Marshall, 2014;Schalk, 2018;Swanson et al, 2015. 3 Para un estudio breve acerca del debate del Antropoceno, ver: Bonneuil & Fressoz, 2016. Para una evaluación importante de los supuestos históricos del concepto, ver: Davis & Todd, 2017. discusión de un Antropoceno "bueno" contra uno "malo" (Hamilton, 2016).…”
Section: The Conference Call: Honoring Le Guin In the Anthropoceneunclassified
“…A most practical distillation of this arises in the discussion of a 'good' versus 'bad' Anthropocene (Hamilton, 2016 heating cannot but manifest the ongoing structural logics and momentum of inhuman, world-rending forces; for the latter, it can activate encounters with more-than-hu-2 Este cuerpo de literatura está creciendo y encamina de muchas formas diferentes la cuestión de lo real y de lo realmente "de otro modo". Ver, por ejemplo: Boes & Marshall, 2014;Schalk, 2018;Swanson et al, 2015. 3 Para un estudio breve acerca del debate del Antropoceno, ver: Bonneuil & Fressoz, 2016. Para una evaluación importante de los supuestos históricos del concepto, ver: Davis & Todd, 2017. discusión de un Antropoceno "bueno" contra uno "malo" (Hamilton, 2016).…”
Section: The Conference Call: Honoring Le Guin In the Anthropoceneunclassified
“…Debates over the ontological significance, theoretical implications, and practical challenges of “living in the Anthropocene” (Kress & Stine, ) have enlivened scholarship in geography and allied social sciences (for reviews, see Castree, ; Castree, ; Castree, ; Cook, Rickards, & Rutherfurd, ; Dalby, ; Lorimer, ; Schlosser, ; Swanson, Bubandt, & Tsing, ). Determining a date when humans irrevocably became a geological force demands and promises a union between social and physical sciences (Ellis, Maslin, Boivin, & Bauer, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine krisenhafte und dringliche Sicht auf MenschUmwelt-Beziehungen im Zeitalter des Anthropozäns 2 (Crutzen, 2002;Swanson et al, 2015;Gibson-Graham und Roelvink, 2010;Steffen et al, 2015;Latour, 2014) radikalisiert die Suche nach relationalen Ansätzen für die Politische Ökologie. Die Dualismen von Mensch-Natur, Natur-Kultur und Naturwissenschaft-Sozialwissenschaft lösen sich, beeinflusst durch Impulse aus STS, Ethnologie sowie feministischer und postkolonialer Theorie, in neuen materialistischen Ansätzen auf.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Relationale Ansätze stehen im Zusammenhang mit einem neuerlichen Interesse an ontologischen Fragestellungen in der geistes-und sozialwissenschaftlichen Umweltforschung (Leff, 2015;Escobar, 2008;Descola, 2013;Viveiros de Castro, 2015;Kohn, 2015 (Swanson et al, 2015). Der Begriff zieht unseres Erachtens nach berechtigte Kritik auf sich, da er von einem homogenen "Anthropos" auszugehen scheint und, ohne auf Klassen und geographische Ungleichheiten einzugehen, die undifferenzierte Gattung "Mensch" zum Verursacher der gegenwärtigen Krise erklärt (Moore, 2015:169-173).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified